Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance reflects the brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers has a Market Performance percentile of 99, indicating a leading position. This shows a strong market presence relative to competitors like KFC, In-N-Out Burger, Culver's, Whataburger, Chili's Grill & Bar and Twin Peaks, all positioned within the same high-performing range.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) measures how well a brand's products/services meet customer expectations, directly impacting loyalty and brand perception.
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers boasts a 75% overall CSAT, a 2.6pp increase year-over-year. Alabama leads with 96%, a 22.5pp increase. The CSAT trend shows variability, peaking in May 2025.
Average Check is a key performance indicator (KPI) reflecting the average amount customers spend per visit, vital for revenue and profitability analysis.
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers' overall Average Check is $18.2, a 2.1% increase year-over-year. Oregon leads at $22.9 USD. The dynamic data indicates fluctuations during the measured period.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion, reflecting market penetration and potential revenue generation across different locations.
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers has the highest number of outlets in Texas (200), followed by California (107) and Louisiana (63). This distribution highlights key markets for the brand's presence and expansion strategy.
Competitor analysis identifies key players attracting the same customer base, crucial for strategic positioning and competitive advantage.
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers customers also frequently visit McDonald's (17.95%), Chick-fil-A (7.88%), Taco Bell (7.55%), Wendy's (6.53%), and Starbucks (5.94%), indicating these brands as primary competitors.
Understanding traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing and resource allocation, improving customer experience and operational efficiency.
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 7 PM, with the highest traffic around 6 PM (70.16%). Traffic is minimal during early morning hours.
Understanding consumer segments helps tailor marketing efforts to specific demographics, maximizing engagement and ROI by appealing to their preferences.
Women have a 90 affinity index while Men have an affinity index of 108 for Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers. Gen X affinity is 113, Gen Y is 91 and Gen Z is 98.