Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Maggiano's Little Italy performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Maggiano's Little Italy performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Maggiano's Little Italy' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Maggiano's Little Italy' competitors in the United States
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Maggiano's Little Italy is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's competitive strength and customer preference within the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States.
Maggiano's Little Italy is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99. This position, in the top 1%, reflects strong customer preference relative to competitors like Nothing Bundt Cakes, Baskin-Robbins, Krystal, DinoLand Cafe, Casey's, and The Hampton Social, who also hold the same high market position.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer loyalty and indicates the brand's success in meeting customer expectations. Important metric for the company.
Maggiano's Little Italy's overall CSAT is 82%, a slight decrease of 1.6 percentage points year-over-year. Nevada shows the highest CSAT at 92% with a 5.3 percentage point increase, while Missouri and Pennsylvania experienced CSAT decreases. The CSAT ranged from 80.47 to 83.06 during the period, with some fluctuations.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, reflecting menu pricing, customer order value and restaurant's revenue generation.
The overall average check for Maggiano's Little Italy is $53.80, a 6.2% increase year-over-year. New York has the highest average check at $64.70. The average check fluctuated between $52.93 and $54.30 during the observed period.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, reflecting expansion strategy and customer accessibility.
Maggiano's Little Italy has the most outlets in Texas (9), followed by Illinois (6). Virginia and Florida each have 4 outlets. Colorado, Maryland and California each have 2 outlets. North Carolina has 2 outlets, as well.
Competitor analysis identifies key players, enabling strategic positioning and competitive advantage.
McDonald's (8.21%) is the most cross-visited brand by Maggiano's Little Italy customers, followed by Chick-fil-A (5.87%), Starbucks (4.39%), The Cheesecake Factory (4.01%) and Texas Roadhouse (3.74%). This indicates that customers who visit Maggiano's also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, guiding staffing and resource allocation for better customer experience.
Maggiano's Little Italy experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 AM and 9:00 PM, with the highest workload at 6:00 PM (60.62). Traffic is minimal between midnight and 5:00 AM.
Consumer segment analysis informs targeted marketing and positioning by understanding key demographic preferences and behaviors.
Maggiano's Little Italy's customer base shows high affinity with women (93), which is slightly below the average consumer. There is also high affinity with men (107), exceeding the average consumer. Gen X (124) are overrepresented, while Gen Y (87) and Gen Z (71) are underrepresented.