Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Little Caesars performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Little Caesars performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Little Caesars' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Little Caesars' competitors in the United States
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Little Caesars is in the top 20% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Little Caesars' market performance is at the 80th percentile, placing it in the average/above average range. This indicates a solid market standing relative to competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Twin Peaks, Culver's, In-N-Out Burger, Dave's Hot Chicken, Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers, and CAVA.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how happy customers are with their experience, impacting loyalty and brand reputation.
Little Caesars' overall CSAT is 49%, a slight decrease of 0.6 percentage points year-over-year. Maine shows the highest CSAT at 79% with a growth of 14.1 percentage points. The CSAT has fluctuated slightly over the months from June to August 2025.
Average check reveals how much customers spend per visit, influencing revenue and profitability.
Little Caesars' overall average check is $15.40, a 1% decrease year-over-year. Connecticut has the highest average check at $20.00. The average check has varied slightly between June and August 2025, peaking in July.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and growth potential.
Little Caesars has the most outlets in California (533) and Texas (529), indicating strong market presence in these states. Michigan follows with 305 outlets. The number of outlets provides insight into the brand's geographic strategy.
Identifying top competitors helps understand market dynamics and benchmark performance against key players.
Little Caesars' top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (27.99%), Taco Bell (11.90%), Burger King (9.96%), Wendy's (9.47%), and Chick-fil-A (7.32%). This shows customer overlap with major fast-food chains.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation.
Little Caesars experiences peak traffic workload between 10:00 AM and 8:00 PM, with the highest traffic around 6:00 PM (63.30%) and 7:00 PM (69.00%). Traffic is minimal during early morning hours.
Understanding consumer demographics enables targeted marketing and product development strategies.
Little Caesars' customer base shows a higher affinity among women (91%) and men (109%). Gen X shows an affinity index of 104%, Gen Y 100%, while Gen Z shows an affinity index of 90%.