Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Bubba Gump Shrimp Co.' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Bubba Gump Shrimp Co.' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, competitive strength, and customer preference in the cafe & restaurant industry.
Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. is in the top 1% and is a leading brand. This high percentile means a substantial share of customer traffic compared to competitors like Marco's Pizza, Bob Evans, Cook Out, Cold Stone Creamery, Checkers, and White Castle, which are also in the top 1%.
Customer satisfaction reflects customer loyalty and overall experience, influencing repeat visits and positive word-of-mouth, crucial for brand growth.
Bubba Gump Shrimp Co.'s overall customer satisfaction is at 87%, a 20.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. Satisfaction is highest in Florida (92%) and New York (91%). California shows 79%, while Texas is at 75%. The CSAT has been relatively stable from May to July 2025, ranging from 86.76% to 87.29%.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, reflecting menu pricing, order sizes, and overall revenue generation capability of the brand.
The overall average check for Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. is $42.80, a 3.5% increase year-over-year. New York and Colorado have the highest average check at $45.40. The average check has increased from $41.86 in May 2025 to $44.53 in July 2025.
Number of outlets reflects brand's reach and market presence, influencing accessibility, brand visibility, and overall market share within the industry.
Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. has the most outlets in California (6), followed by Florida (5). Texas has 3 outlets, Nevada has 2, and New York, Mississippi, Colorado, Tennessee and Minnesota each have 1 outlet.
Competitor analysis helps understand market dynamics, customer preferences, and competitive landscape, guiding strategic decisions for improved market positioning.
The top competitors for Bubba Gump Shrimp Co., based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (7.70%), IHOP (4.29%), In-N-Out Burger (4.11%), Chick-fil-A (3.73%), and Starbucks (3.73%). This indicates that customers who visit Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. also frequent these fast-food and casual dining chains.
Traffic workload analysis shows peak operational hours, enabling resource allocation, staffing optimization, and service quality improvements during busiest times.
Traffic workload for Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. is highest between 5 PM and 7 PM, peaking at 6 PM (63.99%). There is minimal traffic before 10 AM. Traffic significantly increases starting at 11 AM, remaining high throughout the afternoon and evening.
Consumer segment analysis reveals customer demographics and preferences, enabling targeted marketing campaigns, personalized experiences, and enhanced customer engagement strategies.
Women (107 affinity index) are over-represented compared to men (93 affinity index) among Bubba Gump Shrimp Co.'s customers. Gen X (112 affinity index) and Gen Z (118 affinity index) are over-represented, while Gen Y (90 affinity index) is under-represented.