Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Trapper's Sushi performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Trapper's Sushi performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Trapper's Sushi' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Trapper's Sushi' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Trapper's Sushi is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance reveals a brand's share of foot traffic, showing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Trapper's Sushi holds a leading market performance with a percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates a strong market presence and high customer preference compared to competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Planet Smoothie, 100 Fun, Mac's Speed Shop, Benny's Family Restaurant, El Cerro, and Hong BBQ & Hot Pot.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects the degree to which customers are happy with a brand's products, services, and overall experience.
Trapper's Sushi demonstrates strong customer satisfaction, with an overall CSAT of 78%, up 0.6 percentage points year-over-year. Texas shows the highest CSAT at 88%, indicating very satisfied customers, while Washington shows a slightly lower CSAT at 74% with a decrease of 1.5 percentage points. Arizona has a CSAT of 81%, also with an increase of 0.6 percentage points.
Average check is the average amount of money customers spend per visit, influencing revenue and profitability analysis.
Trapper's Sushi has an overall average check of $36.70, with no change year-over-year. Washington shows the highest average check at $37.50, followed by Arizona at $37.30. Texas has a lower average check of $34.30. Stable average check values indicate consistent customer spending habits.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market penetration within a certain area.
Trapper's Sushi has 11 outlets in Washington, indicating a strong presence in that state. Texas and Arizona each have 2 outlets. The distribution of outlets highlights key markets for the brand.
Identifying top competitors helps a brand understand its competitive landscape and strategic positioning.
Trapper's Sushi's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (9.54%), Taco Bell (5.72%), Starbucks (4.90%), Red Robin Gourmet Burgers and Brews (3.00%), and Olive Garden Italian Restaurant (3.00%). This shows that customers of Trapper's Sushi also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload by hour reveals peak hours, which allows staffing and resource allocation to maximize efficiency.
Trapper's Sushi experiences peak traffic workload between 17:00 (71.87%) and 18:00 (73.56%). Traffic gradually increases from 11:00, reaches its peak in the late afternoon/early evening, and declines sharply after 20:00. There is very low traffic from 0:00 to 10:00.
Analyzing consumer segments informs targeted marketing, tailoring products/services, and maximizing engagement across diverse demographics.
Trapper's Sushi's customer base shows a higher affinity towards women (93%) compared to men (107%). Among generations, Gen X is overrepresented (110%), while Gen Y is slightly below the average consumer (99%). Gen Z is underrepresented (79%).