Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Smalls Sliders performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Smalls Sliders performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Smalls Sliders' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Smalls Sliders' competitors in the United States
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Smalls Sliders is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile indicates brand's share of foot traffic, reflecting competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Smalls Sliders' market performance is in the top 1% (99th percentile), indicating a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry. This signifies strong customer preference and competitive advantage. Performance peers include Outcast, Rakkan Ramen, Tiki Docks, Mecatos Bakery & Café, Mazzio's Italian Eatery, and La Mulata | Cuban Restaurant in Miami Beach, all within a similar percentile range.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is vital as it reflects customer loyalty and impacts brand reputation and revenue.
Smalls Sliders has an overall CSAT of 80%, a decrease of 3.1 percentage points year-over-year. Mississippi shows high satisfaction (87%) with significant growth. Louisiana's CSAT is 83% but decreased slightly. Monitoring these state-level differences is crucial for targeted improvements.
Average check reveals spending habits and pricing effectiveness, affecting revenue and profitability analysis.
The overall average check for Smalls Sliders is $15.10, a 3.5% decrease year-over-year. Georgia has the highest average check at $20.20, while other states like Missouri, South Carolina, and Louisiana hover around $15.00. Mississippi has the lowest average check at $14.50. Consistent tracking is essential.
Outlet count shows brand reach. Increasing outlets can boost market share, expanding brand awareness.
Smalls Sliders has 23 outlets. Louisiana has the most (14), followed by Florida (2). Several states including South Carolina, Texas, Mississippi, Missouri, Georgia, Alabama and Arkansas each have only 1 outlet. Focus on increasing number of outlets for expansion.
Understanding key competitors helps a brand identify threats and opportunities for strategic positioning and growth.
Smalls Sliders' top competitors are McDonald's (15.59% cross visitation), Chick-fil-A (8.30%), Whataburger (6.07%), Taco Bell (6.07%), and Waffle House (5.67%). This indicates customers who visit Smalls Sliders also frequent these established fast-food chains.
Traffic workload analysis helps optimize staffing and resource allocation to match demand patterns during the day.
Smalls Sliders experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload around noon (71.80%). Traffic is minimal before 9 AM and declines significantly after 9 PM. Adjusting staffing based on these trends can improve efficiency.
Analyzing consumer segments by gender and generation helps tailor marketing strategies for greater effectiveness.
Women show a slightly lower affinity (94%) while Men show higher affinity (105%). Gen X exhibits the highest affinity (121%), indicating over-representation, while Gen Y (88%) and Gen Z (94%) are under-indexed compared to the average consumer.