Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Quaker Steak & Lube performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Quaker Steak & Lube performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Quaker Steak & Lube' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Quaker Steak & Lube' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Quaker Steak & Lube is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows the brand's competitive strength and customer preference by measuring its share of foot traffic within the industry.
Quaker Steak & Lube is a leading brand, ranking in the top 1% in market performance. This indicates strong customer preference and competitive positioning. Performance peers in a similar range include Bruno's of Brooklyn, The Dirty Buffalo, Thai Street Cafe, Sappe, Yi's Traditional Korean Beef Soup, and Sushi Miroku, all positioned at the 99th percentile.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting retention and revenue through positive customer experiences.
Quaker Steak & Lube's overall customer satisfaction is 73%, up 0.4 percentage points year-over-year. Indiana shows the highest CSAT at 90%, followed by Florida at 89%. Virginia and West Virginia experienced slight decreases in customer satisfaction. CSAT fluctuated between 77.84% and 69.14% from May to July 2025.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, crucial for revenue forecasting, menu optimization, and identifying upselling opportunities.
The overall average check for Quaker Steak & Lube is $25.50, down 6.1% year-over-year. South Carolina has the highest average check at $32.40. The average check ranged from $27.51 in May to $24.58 in July 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion, reflecting growth strategy and market penetration across different geographic areas.
Quaker Steak & Lube has the most outlets in Ohio (13), followed by Pennsylvania (6). Several states, including South Carolina, West Virginia, Florida, Indiana, Virginia, Tennessee and Iowa, have a smaller presence with 1-2 locations.
Understanding key competitors enables strategic positioning and targeted marketing to capture market share and retain customer loyalty.
The top competitors for Quaker Steak & Lube, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (14.04%), Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (7.09%), Wendy's (7.09%), Chick-fil-A (7.09%), and Taco Bell (6.42%). This indicates these brands attract a similar customer base.
Traffic workload patterns inform staffing, inventory management, and promotional timing to optimize operational efficiency and customer experience.
Peak traffic workload for Quaker Steak & Lube occurs between 17:00 and 19:00 (5 PM - 7 PM), with the highest traffic at 18:00 (6 PM) reaching 63.90. Traffic is minimal between 0:00 (midnight) and 5:00 AM.
Analyzing consumer segments allows for targeted marketing and product development based on demographic preferences and behaviors.
Women show a valueLabel 88% affinity towards Quaker Steak & Lube, while men show a valueLabel 111% affinity. Gen X shows a valueLabel 125% affinity, while Gen Y and Gen Z show 79% and 72% affinity, respectively. These affinity values suggest the relative representation of each segment compared to the average consumer.