Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Biscuit Belly performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Biscuit Belly performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Biscuit Belly' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Biscuit Belly' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Biscuit Belly is in the lower 44% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Biscuit Belly's market performance is in the lower 44%, indicating a below average market standing. This suggests that the brand captures less foot traffic compared to its competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Texas Steakhouse and Mariscos El General.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how happy customers are with a brand, impacting loyalty and positive word-of-mouth.
Biscuit Belly has a high overall CSAT of 91%, with a significant increase of 5.4 percentage points year-over-year. Georgia shows the highest CSAT at 96%, with a substantial growth of 34.5 percentage points. Alabama shows a decrease of 5.2 percentage points.
Average check reveals how much customers spend per visit, influencing revenue and profitability.
The overall average check for Biscuit Belly is $19.90, a 2.2% increase year-over-year. Virginia has the highest average check at $22.30. All states show no growth in average check compared to the previous period.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and brand awareness.
Biscuit Belly has the most outlets in Kentucky (5). South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia and Alabama each have 2 outlets. Georgia has 1 outlet. This distribution shows a concentration of locations in Kentucky.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies.
Biscuit Belly's top competitors based on cross-visitation are Chick-fil-A (7.12%), McDonald's (5.75%), Starbucks (4.11%), Waffle House (3.84%), and Taco Bell (3.56%). This indicates that customers who visit Biscuit Belly also frequently visit these fast-food chains.
Traffic workload shows peak hours, helping optimize staffing and resource allocation for better service.
Biscuit Belly experiences peak traffic between 9 AM and 12 PM, with the highest workload at 10 AM (53.29%). There is minimal to no traffic workload between 3 PM and 7 AM. This data suggests focusing resources during the morning hours.
Understanding consumer segments allows targeted marketing, improving engagement and ROI.
Women are overrepresented among Biscuit Belly's customers (110 affinity index), while men are underrepresented (91 affinity index). Gen X (113 affinity index) and Gen Y (105 affinity index) are overrepresented, while Gen Z (61 affinity index) is significantly underrepresented.