Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Lucky Sushi performance in the Mexico and how they change over time
See what factors influence Lucky Sushi performance in the Mexico and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Lucky Sushi' competitors in the Mexico
An analysis of Lucky Sushi' competitors in the Mexico
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Lucky Sushi is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance indicates brand's share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Lucky Sushi's market performance is at the 99th percentile, which positions it as a leading brand in Mexico's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This high percentile indicates strong market presence and customer preference compared to its peers like Pingo Grill, Los Chachalacos, Chai, Teikit Sushi & Noodles, Eladio's, and La Cervecería de Barrio, all positioned at the 99th percentile.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how happy customers are, directly impacting loyalty and repeat business.
Lucky Sushi's overall CSAT is 86%, a decrease of 5.6pp year-over-year. Hidalgo shows the highest CSAT at 96% with a growth of 3.4pp, while Morelos and State of Mexico show decreased CSAT. Monitoring and addressing the drivers of CSAT decline in specific states is crucial for maintaining a positive brand image and customer loyalty.
Average check reveals how much customers spend per visit, influencing overall revenue and profitability.
Lucky Sushi's average check is 249.3 MXN, a 4.5% increase year-over-year. The State of Mexico has the highest average check at 260.7 MXN. While Morelos has 230.8 MXN and Hidalgo has 217.6 MXN average check. A rising average check suggests customers are either ordering more or higher-priced items.
Number of outlets indicates brand's reach and accessibility, vital for market penetration and growth.
Lucky Sushi has 10 outlets in the State of Mexico, 2 in Morelos, and 1 in Hidalgo. The distribution of outlets reflects the brand's presence across different regions, with a concentration in the State of Mexico. Expansion strategies could focus on increasing the number of outlets in other states.
Understanding key competitors helps refine strategies and identify opportunities to gain market share.
Lucky Sushi's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are Little Caesars (5.13%), La Casa de Toño (4.37%), Burger King (4.15%), McDonald's (3.82%) and Starbucks (3.82%). These brands represent alternative dining choices for Lucky Sushi's customers, and highlights opportunities for differentiation in menu or service.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation.
Lucky Sushi's peak traffic workload occurs between 12:00 PM and 10:00 PM, with highest workload around 5:00 PM - 7:00 PM. Almost no traffic before 11:00 AM and after 10:00 PM. Efficiently managing resources during these peak hours is crucial for ensuring optimal customer service and operational efficiency.
Understanding consumer demographics allows for targeted marketing and product development.
Lucky Sushi's customer base shows a higher affinity among women (113) and Gen Z (180). Men are under-indexed (90). Gen X is significantly under-indexed (56) and Gen Y is around average (107). Marketing should focus on the over-indexed groups.