Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Kona Grill performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Kona Grill performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Kona Grill' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Kona Grill' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Kona Grill is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance reveals a brand’s share of foot traffic, showing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Kona Grill's market performance is leading, with a percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates a strong market presence and customer preference compared to competitors like Mister O1 Pizza, Chuck E. Cheese, Talkin'Tacos, Del Taco, Huddle House, and Mellow Mushroom.
Customer satisfaction is critical for loyalty and growth, reflecting service quality and brand perception, impacting repeat business and positive recommendations.
Kona Grill has a high customer satisfaction rate of 86%, although it experienced a slight decrease of 1.2 percentage points year-over-year. Nevada leads in satisfaction at 95%, followed by Illinois and Texas at 92%. Colorado has the lowest satisfaction at 90%. Overall, customer satisfaction remains strong.
The average check is a key revenue indicator, influenced by menu pricing and customer spending habits, showing economic performance and customer value perception.
Kona Grill's overall average check is $48.1, a decrease of 6.4% year-over-year. Illinois reports the highest average check at $55.5, while Colorado's average check is $49.7. The decrease suggests a need to evaluate pricing strategies and customer spending patterns.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion efforts, showing business growth and market penetration across different geographic locations.
Kona Grill has a diverse geographic presence with varying outlet counts. Texas leads with 4 locations, while Ohio and Arizona each have 2. Several states, including Nevada, Maryland, and Utah, have only 1 outlet each, indicating areas for potential expansion.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing strategic decisions and revealing opportunities for differentiation and market positioning.
Kona Grill's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (4.85%), Chick-fil-A (3.09%), Chipotle Mexican Grill (2.79%), Starbucks (2.73%), and Taco Bell (1.88%). This data shows Kona Grill customers also frequent these popular quick-service and fast-casual restaurants.
Traffic workload distribution highlights peak operational times, guiding staffing and resource allocation for optimal customer service and operational efficiency.
Kona Grill experiences peak traffic between 11:00 AM and 10:00 PM, with the highest workload around 6:00 PM. The lowest traffic is from midnight to 10:00 AM. These workload patterns can inform staffing and promotional strategies for optimal efficiency.
Understanding consumer demographics is crucial for targeted marketing, enabling customized campaigns and product offerings, appealing to specific consumer groups.
Kona Grill's customer base shows a higher affinity towards women (index 118) compared to men (index 83). Gen Y shows the highest affinity (index 110), while Gen X is slightly under-indexed (index 99), and Gen Z is also under-indexed (index 91). This suggests targeted marketing towards women and Gen Y may yield better results.