Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Kobé Japanese Steakhouse performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Kobé Japanese Steakhouse performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Kobé Japanese Steakhouse' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Kobé Japanese Steakhouse' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Kobé Japanese Steakhouse is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile reveals the brand’s share of foot traffic, a key indicator of competitive strength and customer preference.
Kobé Japanese Steakhouse's market performance is in the top 1% in the US, indicating a leading position. This shows strong customer preference and competitive advantage. Performance peers in a similar range include Tom's Watch Bar, Pisco y Nazca Ceviche Gastrobar, Golden Chick, Rodizio Grill, Urban Plates, and Flanigan's Seafood Bar and Grill.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how well a brand meets customer expectations, influencing loyalty and repeat business.
Kobé Japanese Steakhouse has an overall CSAT of 91%, a slight decrease of 1 percentage point year-over-year. Florida leads with 92%, while Missouri shows the highest growth at 21.1pp. North Carolina and Texas have lower CSAT scores, suggesting areas for improvement. Recent months show consistent CSAT around 91%.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, vital for revenue analysis and pricing strategy adjustments.
The overall average check for Kobé Japanese Steakhouse is $52.80, up 1.8% year-over-year. Florida has the highest average check at $53.20. Georgia, North Carolina, Missouri and Texas average checks are lower, revealing regional spending variations. Recent months show consistent average check around $52.
The number of outlets indicates brand reach and expansion, impacting market presence and accessibility for customers.
Kobé Japanese Steakhouse has 19 outlets in the United States. Florida dominates with 13 locations. Georgia has 2 outlets, while North Carolina, Texas, Missouri, and Alabama each have 1 outlet. This distribution reveals the brand's concentration in Florida.
Identifying top competitors helps refine marketing, understand market share, and improve competitive strategies.
Kobé Japanese Steakhouse's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (6.30%), Keke's Breakfast Cafe (4.56%), IHOP (3.84%), Chick-fil-A (3.66%), and First Watch (3.00%). This indicates that customers of Kobé also frequent these fast-food and breakfast chains.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
Traffic workload peaks between 17:00 (5 PM) and 20:00 (8 PM), with the highest traffic at 19:00 (7 PM). There is minimal activity before 11:00 AM. This shows the restaurant's busiest hours are during the late afternoon and evening.
Understanding consumer demographics (gender, generation) enables targeted campaigns and tailored marketing for higher engagement.
Women show a high affinity (119 Index) for Kobé Japanese Steakhouse. Men are under-indexed (83 Index). Gen Y and Gen Z segments are over-represented (108 Index each), while Gen X shows slightly lower affinity (93 Index).