Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Rodizio Grill performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Rodizio Grill performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Rodizio Grill' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Rodizio Grill' competitors in the United States
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Rodizio Grill is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's foot traffic share, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Rodizio Grill's market performance is leading with a percentile of 99, indicating a strong competitive position. It signifies that the brand attracts more customer traffic than 99% of brands in the Cafe & Restaurants industry. Performance peers in the same percentile range include: Urban Plates, Tom's Watch Bar, Captain D's, Kobé Japanese Steakhouse, Playa Bowls, and Pisco y Nazca Ceviche Gastrobar.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is vital as it reflects customer loyalty, impacts brand reputation, and drives business growth through repeat visits.
Rodizio Grill's overall CSAT is 93%, up 3 percentage points year-over-year, indicating improved customer happiness. Wisconsin and Tennessee show high CSAT at 96%. New Jersey demonstrates the largest CSAT growth, with a 14.2 percentage point increase. Overall, it shows that customers are satisfied with service.
Average check reveals spending habits, reflecting menu pricing and customer purchase behavior, impacting revenue and profitability analysis.
Rodizio Grill's overall average check is $64.10, a 1.8% increase year-over-year, suggesting customers are spending slightly more per visit. Ohio has the highest average check at $73.00. The average check amount demonstrates the customer's purchase behavior.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion, crucial for market penetration and accessibility for customers.
Rodizio Grill has the most outlets in Florida (5), followed by Colorado (3). Tennessee, Utah, and Arizona each have 2 outlets. This distribution shows where the brand has strongest physical presence.
Competitor analysis reveals brand positioning relative to alternatives, informing strategies for differentiation and competitive advantage.
Rodizio Grill's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (5.43%), Chick-fil-A (3.13%), Starbucks (2.78%), Texas Roadhouse (2.60%), and Taco Bell (2.36%). It means that customers who visit Rodizio Grill also frequently visit these fast food chains.
Traffic workload by hours identifies peak times, enabling staffing and resource optimization to enhance customer experience.
Rodizio Grill experiences peak traffic between 17:00 (5 PM) and 19:00 (7 PM), with the highest workload at 18:00 (6 PM) at 57.79. Minimal traffic occurs between midnight and 10:00 (10 AM). This indicates that dinner is the most popular time.
Consumer segment analysis allows tailored marketing, improving engagement and ROI by matching products and messaging to specific demographics.
Rodizio Grill's customer base consists of 101% women and 99% men (affinity index). Gen Z are highly represented (111%), followed by Gen Y (103%), and then Gen X (100%).