Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence El Jannah Chicken performance in the Australia and how they change over time
See what factors influence El Jannah Chicken performance in the Australia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of El Jannah Chicken' competitors in the Australia
An analysis of El Jannah Chicken' competitors in the Australia
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
El Jannah Chicken is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile indicates brand's foot traffic share, reflecting competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
El Jannah Chicken is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1%. This indicates strong customer preference and a significant market share compared to its peers like Oporto, Nando's and Pizza Hut, which are in the same percentile range.
Customer satisfaction reveals brand perception and loyalty, impacting repeat business and positive word-of-mouth, crucial for sustainable growth.
El Jannah Chicken shows a strong customer satisfaction, with an overall CSAT of 75%, a 5.2 percentage point increase year-over-year. The Australian Capital Territory and Victoria show the highest CSAT at 79%, indicating effective customer service in these states, while New South Wales has 72%.
Average check measures customer spending per visit, indicating pricing strategy effectiveness and customer willingness to invest in the brand.
The overall average check for El Jannah Chicken is 38.8 AUD, a 4.5% increase year-over-year, suggesting increased customer spending. New South Wales has the highest average check at 41.2 AUD, indicating potentially higher prices or larger orders in that state.
Number of outlets reflects brand reach and market penetration, influencing accessibility and overall revenue generation potential.
El Jannah Chicken has a significant presence in New South Wales, with 23 outlets. Victoria follows with 12 outlets, and the Australian Capital Territory has 1 outlet. This distribution impacts brand visibility and customer access across regions.
Identifying key competitors helps in strategic benchmarking, revealing competitive threats and opportunities for differentiation and market share growth.
McDonald's (14.33%), KFC (7.63%), and Hungry Jack's Burgers (6.44%) are the top competitors based on cross-visitation. This suggests that customers who visit El Jannah Chicken also frequently visit these fast-food chains.
Analyzing traffic workload by hour uncovers peak times, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation to optimize customer service and revenue.
El Jannah Chicken experiences peak traffic between 17:00 and 19:00 (5 PM - 7 PM), with the highest workload at 71.51%. Traffic is minimal between midnight and 9:00 AM, indicating nighttime closure or low early-morning demand.
Analyzing consumer segments by Gender and Generation allows for targeted marketing, optimizing product offerings, and enhancing brand positioning for each group.
El Jannah Chicken demonstrates a high affinity with male consumers (index 124) and a relatively lower affinity with women (index 70). Among generations, Gen Y shows the highest affinity (index 116), while Gen Z is under-indexed (index 81) compared to the average consumer. Gen X affinity is 101.