Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Birdcall - All Natural Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Birdcall - All Natural Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Birdcall - All Natural Chicken' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Birdcall - All Natural Chicken' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Birdcall - All Natural Chicken is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's competitive strength and customer preference, showing its share of foot traffic in the industry.
Birdcall - All Natural Chicken is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1%. This indicates a strong market standing relative to its competitors. Peers in the same percentile range include Mad Chicken, Havana Vieja | Cuban Restaurant in Miami Beach, Las Margaritas Mexican Cantina, Quiznos, The Shack Riverfront Restaurant and Largest Out Back Tiki Bar in FL, and Famous Toastery.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting repeat business and long-term revenue growth.
Birdcall - All Natural Chicken demonstrates strong customer satisfaction with an overall CSAT of 80%, up 1.9 percentage points year-over-year. Texas shows the highest CSAT at 86%, followed by Colorado at 81%. Arizona's CSAT is 72%, indicating an area for potential improvement. CSAT fluctuated over the three-month period, starting at 87.44%, dipping to 75.39%, and ending at 68.11%.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, crucial for revenue forecasting and menu pricing optimization.
The overall average check for Birdcall - All Natural Chicken is $17 USD, a 1.3% increase year-over-year. Colorado has the highest average check at $17.6 USD. Arizona's average check is $16.9 USD, while Texas has the lowest at $14.4 USD. The average check varied from $17.33 to $16.33 throughout the period.
Outlet count signifies brand reach and market presence, impacting accessibility and overall revenue potential.
Birdcall - All Natural Chicken has the most outlets in Colorado with 8 locations. Arizona has 3 outlets, and Texas has 1. This distribution highlights Colorado as a key market for the brand, with opportunities for expansion in Arizona and Texas.
Identifying key competitors reveals direct rivals for market share, enabling strategic positioning and targeted marketing efforts.
Birdcall - All Natural Chicken's top competitors, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (8.33%), Starbucks (6.14%), Chick-fil-A (5.70%), In-N-Out Burger (4.39%), and Taco Bell (3.95%). These figures indicate customer preferences and potential areas for differentiation in offerings and marketing.
Understanding peak traffic times enables efficient staffing, inventory management, and optimized service delivery.
Birdcall - All Natural Chicken experiences peak traffic between 12 PM and 6 PM, with workload ranging from 74.56 to 60.4. The highest traffic workload occurs at 12 PM (74.56) and 1 PM (74.13). Traffic is lowest during the early morning hours (12 AM to 5 AM).
Understanding consumer segments enables tailored marketing, product development, and improved customer engagement strategies.
Birdcall - All Natural Chicken customers show a high affinity towards women (86) and Gen Z (190), which suggests a stronger representation compared to the average. Men are overrepresented (113), while Gen X (97) and Gen Y (94) are underrepresented.