Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Savvy Sliders is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Savvy Sliders performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Savvy Sliders performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Savvy Sliders' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Savvy Sliders' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand strength and customer preference in the cafe & restaurant industry by measuring its foot traffic share.
Savvy Sliders is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1%. This indicates a strong competitive position. Peers in similar range include Jamba, Super Chix, WingHouse, On The Grind, Umi Sushi & Seafood, and Chabella Mexican Fusion.
CSAT reflects customer loyalty and predicts future revenue, informing service improvements and marketing effectiveness assessments.
Savvy Sliders boasts an overall CSAT of 81%, up 5 percentage points year-over-year, signaling improved customer sentiment. Florida leads with 95%, while Michigan shows a slight decrease. The CSAT values show a generally high level of customer satisfaction across different states.
Average check reflects spending per customer, crucial for revenue forecasting and menu optimization to boost profitability.
Savvy Sliders' average check is $17.60, a 1.5% increase year-over-year, suggesting customers are spending slightly more. Louisiana has the highest average check ($20.80), while Mississippi has the lowest ($16.50), indicating regional spending variations.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and growth potential, directly impacting market penetration and customer accessibility.
Savvy Sliders has 40 outlets in Michigan, showing dominance in that state. Texas and Ohio each have 4 outlets, followed by Louisiana with 2, and Florida, Mississippi, and Indiana each with 1. This reveals a concentration in Michigan with expansion potential elsewhere.
Competitor analysis highlights direct rivals and customer preferences, crucial for strategic positioning and competitive advantage.
Savvy Sliders' customers also frequent McDonald's (14.95%), Taco Bell (8.93%), Wendy's (5.83%), White Castle (5.05%), and Chick-fil-A (4.66%). McDonald's is the most visited competitor. This indicates the competitive landscape and potential for targeted marketing.
Traffic workload distribution pinpoints peak hours, enabling optimized staffing and resource allocation for better service efficiency.
Savvy Sliders experiences peak traffic between 10 AM and 8 PM, particularly from 12 PM to 6 PM, with the highest workload at 1 PM (61.30%). Traffic is minimal between 3 AM and 9 AM. This shows when to focus resources for optimal customer service.
Consumer insights by gender and generation enable targeted marketing and customized offerings, improving engagement and ROI.
Savvy Sliders has a high affinity with women (91) and men (108), suggesting over-representation of men and under-representation of women compared to average brand. Among generations, Gen X (94) is under-indexed, while Gen Y (104) and Gen Z (108) are over-indexed.