Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Earls Kitchen + Bar is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Earls Kitchen + Bar performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Earls Kitchen + Bar performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Earls Kitchen + Bar' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Earls Kitchen + Bar' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand strength relative to peers, reflecting customer preference and competitive edge within the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Earls Kitchen + Bar's market performance is leading at the 99th percentile. This shows a strong competitive position. Performance peers in a similar range include Parlor Doughnuts, Flanigan's Seafood Bar and Grill, The Original Pancake House, Margaritaville, Don Julio Mexican Kitchen and Beef'O'Brady's.
Customer satisfaction is key for loyalty and growth. High CSAT scores mean customers are happy, leading to repeat visits and positive word-of-mouth.
Earls Kitchen + Bar has a high customer satisfaction rate of 90%, a substantial increase of 14.3 percentage points year-over-year. Washington shows the highest CSAT at 96%, with Colorado, Virginia, and Florida all at 90%. Massachusetts records 88%. CSAT shows generaly positive trend over time.
Average check is crucial for revenue insights. Tracking it helps understand spending habits and optimize pricing and offerings to boost profits.
The overall average check for Earls Kitchen + Bar is $65, up 17% year-over-year. Massachusetts has the highest average check at $67.5 USD. Florida is at $66 USD, Washington at $65 USD, Virginia at $63.7 USD, and Colorado at $62.6 USD. The average check data shows the trends over time.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion strategy, showing physical presence and growth potential in the Cafe & Restaurants market.
Earls Kitchen + Bar has varying numbers of outlets across different states. Florida leads with 3 outlets. Colorado and Massachusetts each have 2 outlets. Texas, Virginia, Washington, and New Mexico each have 1 outlet. This data reflects the brand's current distribution.
Competitor analysis helps to identify key players and understand customer preferences by understanding cross-visitation patterns.
The top competitors for Earls Kitchen + Bar, based on cross-visitation, are Starbucks (2.77), McDonald's (2.33), Chick-fil-A (1.90), Texas Roadhouse (1.31) and Fogo de Chão Brazilian Steakhouse (1.31). This indicates customer overlap between these brands and Earls Kitchen + Bar.
Traffic workload patterns reveal peak hours, enabling efficient staffing, resource allocation, and service optimization in the Cafe & Restaurants sector.
Earls Kitchen + Bar experiences peak traffic between 17:00 and 20:00, with the highest workload at 18:00. Traffic is lowest between 01:00 and 06:00. The traffic workload is relatively high from 11:00 through 22:00.
Understanding consumer demographics is vital for tailoring marketing. Gender and generation affinity reveals targeted marketing and positioning strategies.
Women are over-represented among Earls Kitchen + Bar consumers (index 121), while men are under-represented (index 83). Gen Y (index 120) and Gen Z (index 133) are over-represented, while Gen X (index 81) is under-represented. These indexes should not be interpreted as percentages.