Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence The Human Bean performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence The Human Bean performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of The Human Bean' competitors in the United States
An analysis of The Human Bean' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
The Human Bean is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's foot traffic share, competitive strength, and customer preference in its industry.
The Human Bean's market performance is at the 99th percentile, a leading position. This means the brand outperforms most competitors in capturing customer traffic. Performance peers include Hattie B's Hot Chicken, Mango Mango Dessert, Blake's Lotaburger, O'Charley's Restaurant & Bar, and The Melt, all within the same leading percentile range.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer loyalty, impacting retention and brand reputation, crucial for sustainable growth.
The Human Bean's overall CSAT is 81%, up 0.1pp year-over-year, indicating positive customer sentiment. Illinois shows the highest CSAT at 94%, with a significant growth of 65.2pp. Other states also show high CSAT scores. The dynamic CSAT data shows fluctuation between 79.20 and 83.54 during the observed period.
Average check reveals spending habits, aiding in menu optimization and targeted promotions to boost revenue per customer.
The Human Bean's overall average check is $8.80, up 11.6% year-over-year, suggesting increased customer spending. Virginia has the highest average check at $15.70. The dynamic average check fluctuates between $8.35 and $9.76, showing monthly spending patterns.
Outlet count indicates brand reach, influencing market share and accessibility for customers, driving revenue potential.
The Human Bean has the most outlets in Oregon (45), demonstrating its strongest market presence there. Arizona follows with 18 outlets, then Idaho with 16. Other states, such as Texas, Nevada, and Ohio, have fewer outlets, showing opportunities for expansion.
Competitive analysis identifies key rivals, informing strategies to differentiate and capture market share by understanding customer choices.
The top competitors for The Human Bean are McDonald's (14.06% cross-visitation), Starbucks (8.14%), Taco Bell (7.77%), Dutch Bros Coffee (7.40%), and Wendy's (5.83%). This indicates that Human Bean customers also frequently visit these establishments.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, enhancing service efficiency and customer experience during peak hours.
The Human Bean experiences peak traffic between 5 AM and 6 PM, with the highest workload around 9 AM (67.11%). Traffic is minimal from 9 PM to 4 AM. These patterns inform staffing and operational strategies to manage peak demand.
Consumer segmentation tailors marketing, aligning with preferences by gender/generation for improved engagement, retention, and brand resonance.
Women are overrepresented among The Human Bean's consumers (index 116), while men are underrepresented (index 85). Gen X shows high affinity (index 118), indicating a strong connection. Gen Y (index 95) and Gen Z (index 77) are underrepresented, suggesting areas for targeted marketing.