Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Teriyaki Madness performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Teriyaki Madness performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Teriyaki Madness' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Teriyaki Madness' competitors in the United States
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Teriyaki Madness is ahead of most brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Teriyaki Madness's market performance is at the 57th percentile, indicating an average market standing. This suggests the brand is performing on par with competitors like Shipley Do-Nuts and DinoLand Cafe, which share the same percentile.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting retention and revenue growth. High CSAT scores are crucial for sustainable success.
Teriyaki Madness has an overall customer satisfaction of 81%, a decrease of 4 percentage points year-over-year. Iowa, Minnesota and Delaware show 100% satisfaction. New Jersey and Arizona show 94% satisfaction.
Average check reveals customer spending habits and pricing effectiveness, influencing revenue per transaction and overall profitability.
The average check for Teriyaki Madness is $19.20, a 3.9% increase year-over-year. Arizona has the highest average check at $24.20. Illinois, California, Kentucky and Montana also have high average check.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion strategy, influencing market penetration and brand visibility across different regions.
Teriyaki Madness has the most outlets in California (29), followed by Texas (25) and Nevada (23). Colorado has 17 outlets, while Tennessee, Florida, Illinois and Ohio each have 7 outlets.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing strategic positioning and competitive advantages in the market.
The top competitors for Teriyaki Madness, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (10.69%), Taco Bell (5.01%), Chick-fil-A (4.66%), Chipotle Mexican Grill (3.64%), and Starbucks (3.64%).
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, ensuring efficient operations and customer service during peak hours.
Teriyaki Madness experiences peak traffic between 10 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload around 12 PM and 1 PM (62.30% and 62.65% respectively). Traffic is minimal during the night.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, tailoring products and messaging to resonate with specific demographic groups for higher engagement.
Women (93%) are slightly under-indexed, while men (107%) are over-indexed. Gen X (97%) is slightly under-indexed, Gen Y (103%) is slightly over-indexed, and Gen Z (79%) is under-indexed.