Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Tavern in the Square performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Tavern in the Square performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Tavern in the Square' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Tavern in the Square' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Tavern in the Square is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand strength and customer preference within its industry, crucial for strategic decision-making.
Tavern in the Square's MARKET PERFORMANCE is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position. This shows a strong competitive advantage. Performance peers in a similar range include Blueberry's Grill, Ivan Ramen, Carmela Coffee, Taqueria 27, Yalda Persian & Middle Eastern Restaurant, and Bellacino's Pizza & Grinders.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is essential for loyalty, positive reviews, and sustained business growth. High CSAT scores indicate strong performance.
Tavern in the Square demonstrates a positive customer experience with an overall CSAT of 79%, a 1.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. CSAT varies by state: Massachusetts leads at 80%, Rhode Island shows significant growth at 77% (up 13.7pp), while Connecticut lags at 74% (down 13.9pp).
Average check reflects spending per customer, vital for revenue forecasting and menu optimization. Tracking this KPI highlights trends.
Tavern in the Square's overall average check is $37.6, up 5.2% year-over-year, signaling increased customer spending. New Hampshire has the highest average check at $50.6 USD. Rhode Island has the lowest average check at $30.5 USD. Massachusetts' average check is $37 USD.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market penetration. Expansion strategies rely on tracking outlet distribution.
Tavern in the Square has 16 outlets. The majority are located in Massachusetts (12 outlets), followed by Rhode Island (2 outlets). New Hampshire and Connecticut each have 1 outlet. This data reveals geographic concentration.
Identifying top competitors based on customer overlap aids in refining strategies for market share and customer retention.
Tavern in the Square's top competitors, based on cross-visitation, are Dunkin' (12.80%), McDonald's (8.24%), Wendy's (5.86%), Burger King (4.77%), and 99 Restaurants (4.12%). This indicates a significant overlap in customer base with these brands.
Understanding traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing, manage inventory, and improve customer experience during peak times.
Tavern in the Square experiences peak traffic between 5 PM and 7 PM, with the highest workload at 6 PM (69.90%). Traffic is minimal in the early morning hours (0 AM - 9 AM). This data allows for efficient resource allocation based on workload.
Analyzing consumer segments allows for tailored marketing, enhancing engagement and brand relevance with different demographic groups.
Tavern in the Square has high affinity with Men (112%) and under-indexed with Women (87%). Gen X shows a slightly over-indexed affinity (105%). Gen Y shows a similar affinity (97%), while Gen Z shows a under-indexed affinity (78%).