Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Slim Chickens performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Slim Chickens performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Slim Chickens' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Slim Chickens' competitors in the United States
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Slim Chickens is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's foot traffic share, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Slim Chickens' market performance is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position. This means the brand outperforms 99% of its competitors. Peers in the same range: Crabby George's, Café Bastille, Insomnia Cookies, Main Event, The Melting Pot, Jet's Pizza.
CSAT measures customer happiness, impacting loyalty and revenue. Tracking CSAT helps identify areas for service improvement to boost customer retention.
Slim Chickens boasts a 75% customer satisfaction, a 2.3pp increase year-over-year. Georgia leads with 85% satisfaction, while Idaho lags at 83%. CSAT decreased from 77.20% in May to 73.22% in July.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, influencing revenue. Monitoring it helps optimize pricing and promotions to maximize sales.
Slim Chickens' average check is $17.10, up 1.5% year-over-year. Colorado has the highest average check at $22.00, while Kansas has $19.60. The average check decreased from $17.39 in May to $17.05 in July.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and growth potential. Monitoring this KPI informs expansion strategies and market penetration efforts.
Slim Chickens has the most outlets in Texas (31) and Arkansas (28). Florida has 14, Alabama has 12, while Oklahoma and Kentucky each have 10 outlets.
Analyzing competitors reveals market dynamics. It helps to understand customer choices, benchmark performance, and refine strategies for better positioning.
Slim Chickens' top competitors are McDonald's (17.43% cross visitation), Chick-fil-A (8.95%), Taco Bell (7.92%), Wendy's (7.68%), and Sonic Drive-In (7.26%). This shows where Slim Chickens customers also spend money.
Traffic workload insights enable optimal staffing and resource allocation. Managing workload ensures customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.
Slim Chickens' peak traffic is between 12:00-13:00 (76.63), with significant volume between 11:00-14:00. Traffic decreases substantially after 21:00, with the lowest traffic between 0:00-09:00.
Consumer segment analysis informs targeted marketing. Understanding demographics allows tailoring strategies for optimal engagement and brand loyalty.
Women show an affinity index of 89, while Men show an affinity index of 110. Gen X shows an affinity index of 119, Gen Y 90 and Gen Z 77. The higher index shows the interest of each segment to the brand.