Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Manhattan Pizza performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Manhattan Pizza performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Manhattan Pizza' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Manhattan Pizza' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Manhattan Pizza is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows a brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Manhattan Pizza's market performance is at the 98th percentile, which means the brand holds a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States. This indicates strong customer preference compared to its competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile: Great Steak, Flying W Ranch & Chuckwagon Supper, Rasoi Indian Cuisine, L. Woods Tap & Pine Lodge, Cupitol Coffee & Eatery, ChòpnBlọk.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects loyalty. High CSAT scores often correlate with repeat business and positive word-of-mouth referrals.
Manhattan Pizza's overall CSAT is 84%, a 6.5 percentage point increase year-over-year, suggesting improved customer experiences. Virginia and North Carolina show strong CSAT at 86%. Maryland's CSAT is lower at 68%. The dynamic CSAT data indicates fluctuation between May and July 2025, peaking in June.
Average check reveals spending habits. Monitoring this KPI helps optimize pricing strategies and identify revenue growth opportunities.
Manhattan Pizza's overall average check is $22.30, a 7.7% decrease year-over-year. Virginia shows an average check of $20.90, while North Carolina's is $20.20. The dynamic average check data shows a decline from May to July 2025, indicating possible shifts in spending behavior.
Outlet count reflects market presence. Tracking the number of locations indicates growth and brand expansion strategies.
Manhattan Pizza has a total of 14 outlets. Virginia has 9 outlets, constituting the majority. North Carolina and Maryland each have 2 outlets, and Massachusetts has 1. This distribution reveals a concentration of outlets in Virginia.
Competitor analysis reveals key rivals. Monitoring cross-visitation patterns helps refine strategies to gain market share and customer loyalty.
The top competitors for Manhattan Pizza, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (12.35%), Dunkin' (7.41%), Chipotle Mexican Grill (7.41%), Taco Bell (6.17%), and Chick-fil-A (6.17%). This indicates that customers of Manhattan Pizza also frequently visit these fast-food chains.
Traffic workload shows peak hours. Analyzing traffic patterns optimizes staffing and resource allocation for better service efficiency.
Manhattan Pizza's peak traffic hours are between 11:00 AM and 8:00 PM, with the highest workload observed around 12:00 PM (62.25%). There is minimal to no traffic workload during the early morning hours (0:00 to 9:00 AM) and after 9:00 PM, suggesting potential adjustments in operating hours.
Understanding segments focuses marketing. Identifying consumer preferences allows targeted campaigns, improving engagement and ROI.
Women show a high affinity (82%) for Manhattan Pizza, whereas men show over-representation (117%). Gen Y also exhibits a high affinity (119%). Gen X and Gen Z show under-representation with affinity values of 37% and 79% respectively.