Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Mambo Seafood performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Mambo Seafood performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Mambo Seafood' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Mambo Seafood' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Mambo Seafood is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals brand’s share of foot traffic, showing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Mambo Seafood holds a leading position with a percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates strong customer preference compared to peers like Plaza Azteca Mexican Restaurant, Willie's Grill & Icehouse, Thirsty Lion, Rosa's Café & Tortilla Factory, Taco Palenque, and Pelicana Chicken, all positioned at the same percentile.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception. Tracking CSAT helps in understanding and improving customer loyalty and overall business health.
Mambo Seafood demonstrates strong customer satisfaction, with an overall CSAT score of 90%, reflecting positive customer experiences. This score increased by 5.3 percentage points year-over-year, indicating improvement in customer satisfaction. The highest satisfaction is observed in Texas, with a CSAT score of 90%.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit. Monitoring this KPI helps assess pricing strategy effectiveness and identify revenue growth opportunities.
Mambo Seafood's average check is $35.30, reflecting the typical customer spend. There was a slight decrease of 0.2% year-over-year. In Texas, the average check is $35.30. The average check indicates a possible need to reassess value perception, as customer traffic is high but spending is slightly down.
Tracking outlet numbers indicates brand's market presence and expansion. It reveals growth strategy execution and potential market reach.
Mambo Seafood has 15 outlets located in Texas. This provides a focused geographic presence. The number of outlets highlights the brand's established, yet regionally concentrated, operational footprint within the United States.
Identifying competitors reveals market landscape. Understanding competitive dynamics enables strategic positioning and differentiation efforts.
Mambo Seafood's customers also frequent McDonald's (16.05%), Whataburger (9.81%), Chick-fil-A (6.62%), Texas Roadhouse (5.22%), and Burger King (4.97%). This cross-visitation data indicates the brand shares customer base with fast-food and casual dining chains. Mambo Seafood's positioning in the broader food service market should account for these preferences.
Traffic workload insights inform staffing and resource allocation. Efficiently managing peak hours optimizes customer service and operational efficiency.
Mambo Seafood experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 10 PM, with the highest workload around 6 PM and 7 PM (55.96% and 56.07%, respectively). Minimal traffic is observed during early morning hours. This hourly workload pattern requires staff scheduling to be optimized to handle peak demand effectively, mainly in the evening.
Understanding consumer demographics enables targeted marketing. Aligning strategies with segment preferences maximizes engagement and ROI.
Mambo Seafood shows high affinity with women (105 index), with over-representation in Gen X (121 index) segments and under-representation in Gen Y and Gen Z (93 and 75 index) segments, indicating different engagement levels across genders and generations. Marketing should cater to strong female representation and to Gen X, with Gen Y and Gen Z under-indexed.