Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Buona performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Buona performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Buona' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Buona' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Buona is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile as brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Buona is a leading brand with a 99th percentile Market Performance in the United States' Cafe & Restaurants industry. This indicates a very strong market position, enjoying a high degree of customer preference compared to peers like Eddie V's Prime Seafood, Big Whiskey's American Restaurant & Bar and PDQ.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception. High CSAT suggests strong customer loyalty and positive brand equity, essential for sustained growth.
Buona's overall customer satisfaction is high at 89%, with a significant increase of 7.9 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT is strongest in Wisconsin (90%), followed closely by Illinois (89%) and Indiana (86%). This indicates strong customer loyalty.
Average check reflects spending per customer. Tracking this KPI reveals revenue trends and informs pricing/promotional strategies for optimal profitability.
Buona's average check is $18, reflecting a year-over-year decrease of 4.1%. The average check in Indiana is $21.2 USD, while Wisconsin and Illinois are $17.9 USD and $17.7 USD respectively, indicating potential differences in customer spending habits.
Outlet count indicates market reach. Monitoring outlet numbers shows expansion/contraction, reflecting business growth or strategic adjustments in different locations.
Buona has a total of 31 outlets. The majority of these are located in Illinois (27), with 2 outlets each in Indiana and Wisconsin. This shows a strong concentration in Illinois with smaller presence in Indiana and Wisconsin.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals. Analyzing cross-visitation patterns reveals direct competitors and shared customer bases, essential for strategic positioning.
Buona's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (13.62%), Culver's (8.92%), Portillo's (8.14%), Dunkin' (6.89%), and Starbucks (6.73%). This means a significant portion of Buona's customers also visit these establishments.
Traffic workload by hours reveals peak times. Identifying these patterns allows optimal staffing and resource allocation, enhancing customer experience and efficiency.
Buona experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 7 PM, with the highest workload around 6 PM (76.42%) and 1 PM (74.57%). Traffic is minimal during early morning hours. Efficient resource allocation would be optimal around peak hours.
Analyzing consumer segments by Gender and Generation enables targeted marketing. Affinity insights inform tailored campaigns, boosting engagement and brand resonance.
Buona's customer base shows over-representation by women (101 affinity index), indicating a slightly stronger affinity among female consumers. Gen X has a high affinity (131), while Gen Y (80) and Gen Z (48) are under-indexed, suggesting they are less represented compared to average.