Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Thirsty Lion is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Thirsty Lion performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Thirsty Lion performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Thirsty Lion' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Thirsty Lion' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand strength and customer preference in the industry, measured by foot traffic share against peers.
Thirsty Lion's market performance is in the top 1% (leading). This means the brand captures a significant share of foot traffic. Performance peers in the 99th percentile include Bocas Grill, Coastal Orange Beach, HuHot Mongolian Grill, Kilwins Chocolate & Ice Cream Shop, Hibachi 2 U, and Black Rock Coffee Bar.
CSAT reflects customer happiness. Tracking changes helps maintain and improve service quality, addressing potential issues promptly.
Overall CSAT for Thirsty Lion is 84%, a decrease of 2.7 percentage points year-over-year. Texas shows the highest CSAT (89%), while Arizona has the lowest (81%). This indicates potential service variations across different states that need attention.
Average check indicates spending per customer. Monitoring trends aids revenue optimization by understanding customer purchasing behavior.
Thirsty Lion's overall average check is $37.10, a decrease of 1.3% year-over-year. Oregon has the highest average check ($41.60), while Arizona has the lowest ($33.30). This variance suggests regional pricing or menu differences.
Outlet count reflects brand presence. Expansion or contraction shows strategic growth and market coverage adjustments.
Thirsty Lion has 5 outlets in Arizona, 4 in Texas, 2 in Oregon, and 1 in Colorado. Arizona represents the largest concentration of Thirsty Lion locations. This distribution highlights key markets for the brand.
Identifying competitors reveals brand positioning and customer choices, guiding strategies to enhance differentiation and loyalty.
Thirsty Lion's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (7.71%), Starbucks (4.95%), In-N-Out Burger (4.80%), Texas Roadhouse (3.49%), and Chick-fil-A (3.49%). This shows Thirsty Lion customers also frequent fast-food and casual dining options.
Traffic workload patterns reveal peak hours, enabling optimal staffing and resource allocation for enhanced customer experience.
Thirsty Lion experiences peak traffic between 17:00 and 19:00 (5 PM to 7 PM), with the highest workload at 67.70%. Traffic is minimal in the early morning hours. This pattern guides staffing and promotional efforts.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing. Affinity insights inform positioning, resonating with key demographic groups.
Thirsty Lion's customer base shows a high affinity for women (97%) and men (103%), indicating a balanced gender mix. The generations segment shows Gen X is overrepresented (123%), while Gen Y (84%) and Gen Z (92%) are underrepresented.