Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
The Jalapeno Tree is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence The Jalapeno Tree performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence The Jalapeno Tree performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of The Jalapeno Tree' competitors in the United States
An analysis of The Jalapeno Tree' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
The Jalapeno Tree's MARKET PERFORMANCE percentile is 99, indicating a leading position in the market. This shows a very strong market standing compared to its competitors. Performance peers in similar range: Gunther Toody's, Girl & the Goat, Hot Head Burritos, Don Felix Bar & Restaurant, Sticky Rice, and Icy-N-Spicy.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is crucial for understanding customer loyalty and predicting future revenue and brand reputation.
The Jalapeno Tree has an overall customer satisfaction of 78%, reflecting positive customer sentiment. This is up by 4.3 percentage points year-over-year, signaling improved customer experience. Texas matches the overall CSAT. Recent months show a slight CSAT fluctuation.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, helping optimize pricing strategies and menu offerings for revenue maximization.
The Jalapeno Tree's overall average check is $24.50, a decrease of 5.9% year-over-year, suggesting decreased spending per visit. The average check in Texas is $24.50. Recent months show slight fluctuations with average check.
Tracking the number of outlets indicates brand growth and market reach, which is essential for assessing expansion strategies.
The Jalapeno Tree has 15 outlets in Texas. This indicates a concentrated presence in this state, showing the current scale of the brand’s physical footprint.
Identifying key competitors through cross-visitation patterns allows for strategic benchmarking and competitive advantage analysis.
The top competitors for The Jalapeno Tree, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (19.35%), Whataburger (17.74%), Sonic Drive-In (12.58%), Chick-fil-A (9.68%), and Dairy Queen (6.77%). These brands capture shared customer traffic.
Understanding traffic workload by hours helps optimize staffing and resource allocation to meet demand efficiently.
The Jalapeno Tree experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload around 6 PM (64.21). Traffic is minimal during early morning hours, meaning you should manage shifts and staffing accordingly.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation is strategically important for targeted marketing and positioning strategies.
Women show high affinity (119) towards the brand, indicating they are overrepresented among The Jalapeno Tree’s consumers, while Men are underrepresented(84). Gen X exhibits the highest affinity (153), whereas Gen Y (58) and Gen Z (49) are under-indexed, suggesting marketing may need to target these generations.