Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Sushia is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Sushia performance in the Australia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sushia performance in the Australia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Sushia' competitors in the Australia
An analysis of Sushia' competitors in the Australia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals competitive strength and customer preference in the industry by showing a brand’s share of foot traffic.
Sushia, with a market performance percentile of 99 in Australia's Cafe & Restaurants industry, is a leading brand. This top 1% position indicates a strong competitive standing. Peers in similar range: Cafe 63, Zarraffa's Coffee, Okami Japanese Restaurant, Masala Kitchen, Roll'd, Biwon.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception. High CSAT correlates with loyalty, repeat business, and positive word-of-mouth, driving revenue.
Sushia's overall CSAT is 96%, up 1.8pp year-over-year, indicating improved customer sentiment. Western Australia leads with 97% CSAT, up 11.3pp, while New South Wales shows a decrease of -2.7pp to 96%, suggesting area-specific strategies are needed. Queensland has CSAT 94%, up 8.9pp.
Average check reveals customer spending habits and revenue potential. Monitoring it helps optimize pricing, promotions, and menu offerings.
Sushia's overall average check is 23 AUD, down -2.2% year-over-year. Western Australia has the highest average check at 31.9 AUD, while Queensland's is 16.3 AUD. The decrease suggests a need to analyze pricing or customer spending habits.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence. Growth reflects expansion strategy and potential revenue generation capabilities.
Sushia has 16 outlets in New South Wales, 9 in Western Australia, and 8 in Queensland. The distribution highlights New South Wales as the primary market, with Western Australia and Queensland following.
Understanding competitors' visitor overlap informs targeted marketing. It helps identify opportunities to capture market share and refine customer acquisition strategies.
Sushia's top competitors by customer cross-visitation are KFC (6.35%), McDonald's (3.97%), Guzman y Gomez (3.17%), Hungry Jack's Burgers (3.17%), and Kickin'Inn (2.38%). This suggests potential customers also frequent fast-food chains and similar restaurants.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing, marketing, and resource allocation, ensuring efficient operations and maximizing revenue during peak hours.
Sushia's peak traffic workload occurs between 12 PM and 1 PM (70.79), with significant activity from 10 AM to 3 PM. Traffic is minimal outside of business hours. The data indicates a need for staffing optimization during peak times.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation informs marketing, enabling targeted campaigns that resonate with distinct customer groups.
Sushia's customer base shows a higher affinity among women (105 index) compared to men (96 index). There is a notably high affinity among Gen Z (210 index), indicating a strong preference, and Gen Y with index of 100, suggesting an average representation.