Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Slim Chickens is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Slim Chickens performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Slim Chickens performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Slim Chickens' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Slim Chickens' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Slim Chickens, with a market performance percentile of 99, is a leading brand. This position indicates a strong competitive advantage and high customer preference compared to industry peers such as Maggiano's Little Italy, The Big Biscuit, Chuy's, Gordon Ramsay, Jack's, and Jet's Pizza, who are also in the top 1%.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting retention and revenue growth.
Slim Chickens demonstrates a robust customer satisfaction level, with an overall CSAT of 75%, increasing by 3.3 percentage points year-over-year. Idaho shows the highest CSAT at 93%, followed by South Dakota (86%), Maryland (86%), Nevada (84%), and Georgia (84%). This indicates high customer loyalty and positive brand perception across key states.
Average check is a key revenue indicator, showing how much customers spend per visit and reflecting pricing strategy effectiveness.
Slim Chickens' average check is $17.1, a 0.5% increase year-over-year, demonstrating moderate revenue growth per transaction. Colorado leads with an average check of $22.2, followed by New Mexico ($22), Idaho ($21.2), Arizona ($20.1), and Georgia ($19.1). This data reveals variations in customer spending across different states.
Outlet count indicates market reach and expansion, reflecting brand growth and customer accessibility.
Slim Chickens has a significant presence across the United States, with Texas leading in the number of outlets (32), followed by Arkansas (27), Florida (14), Alabama (12), Oklahoma (10), and Kentucky (10). This distribution highlights the brand's established markets and growth strategies in different regions.
Identifying top competitors is crucial for strategic benchmarking, revealing key market players and customer preferences.
Slim Chickens' customers also frequently visit McDonald's (16.81%), Taco Bell (7.40%), Chick-fil-A (6.78%), Wendy's (6.34%), and Sonic Drive-In (6.09%). This overlap reveals the competitive landscape and the fast-food preferences of Slim Chickens' customer base.
Understanding traffic workload helps optimize staffing and resource allocation, enhancing operational efficiency and customer experience.
Slim Chickens experiences peak traffic workload between 10 AM and 8 PM, with the highest traffic around 12 PM (75.84%). There is significantly less traffic during the early morning hours. This data informs staffing and resource allocation strategies to meet customer demand effectively.
Analyzing consumer segments enables targeted marketing strategies, tailoring offerings to specific demographic preferences.
Slim Chickens shows an overrepresentation of Men (112 index) compared to average consumer and underrepresentation of Women (85 index). Gen X is overrepresented (112 index), while Gen Y (94 index) and Gen Z (87 index) are underrepresented. This affinity data aids in tailoring marketing messages and product offerings to resonate with the most engaged consumer groups.