Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Le Peep is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Le Peep performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Le Peep performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Le Peep' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Le Peep' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reflects the brand’s share of foot traffic, showing competitive strength and customer preference.
Le Peep's MARKET PERFORMANCE percentile is 99, indicating a leading position. This high percentile means Le Peep captures a significant share of customer foot traffic compared to its peers like Ashoka Indian Restaurant, McCormick & Schmick's, Rise, Sarpino's Pizzeria, Bamian Restaurant and Cafe 34 Istanbul, all at the same percentile.
CSAT shows how happy customers are with a brand. It helps identify what's working well and what needs improvement to keep customers coming back.
Le Peep's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 76%, a slight decrease of 0.8 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT varies by state, with Illinois at 96% and Missouri showing a notable decrease. The CSAT trend from April to June 2025 shows fluctuation, with a peak in May.
Average check measures how much customers spend per visit, indicating pricing strategy effectiveness and customer spending habits.
Le Peep's overall average check is $20.70, a decrease of 5.5% year-over-year. South Carolina has the highest average check at $24.40, while the average check fluctuated from April to June 2025, peaking in April.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, impacting accessibility and potential customer base across different regions.
Le Peep has a varying number of outlets by state, with Colorado and Indiana leading at 8 locations each. Illinois follows with 5 outlets. Other states like Nebraska, Tennessee, Idaho, Texas and Ohio have fewer locations, which influences overall brand visibility and customer access in those areas.
Identifying competitors shows who else customers consider, helping refine strategy to stand out and attract more business.
Le Peep's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (8.29%), Starbucks (5.21%), Taco Bell (4.50%), Cracker Barrel Old Country Store (4.50%), and Chick-fil-A (4.03%). This data shows customers who visit Le Peep also frequent these brands, so they are alternatives.
Understanding traffic workload helps optimize staffing and resources to meet customer demand efficiently throughout the day.
Le Peep experiences peak traffic workload between 9 AM and 12 PM, with the highest at 10 AM. Traffic is minimal outside of 6 AM - 2 PM. This workload distribution suggests a strong focus on breakfast and brunch services.
Understanding consumer segments allows for targeted marketing, ensuring the right message reaches the right people for better results.
Le Peep's customer base shows high affinity among women (index 104) and Gen X (index 124), indicating these segments are overrepresented relative to the average consumer. Gen Y (82) and Gen Z (70) segments are underrepresented, suggesting potentially lower affinity or engagement with the brand.