Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Hungry Howie's Pizza is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Hungry Howie's Pizza performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Hungry Howie's Pizza performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Hungry Howie's Pizza' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Hungry Howie's Pizza' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile shows brand's foot traffic share, vital for competitive strength and customer preference analysis in the industry.
Hungry Howie's Pizza, with a Market Performance percentile of 99, is a leading brand. This high percentile indicates a strong market presence and high customer preference compared to competitors. Performance peers include Gringo's Mexican Kitchen, Schlotzsky's, Andy's Frozen Custard, Velvet Taco, Joe's Crab Shack and La Pecora Bianca.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is crucial for understanding customer loyalty and identifying areas for service improvement.
Hungry Howie's Pizza has an overall CSAT of 71%, a slight increase of 0.1 percentage points year-over-year. Nevada shows the highest CSAT at 89%, while Texas has a slightly decreased CSAT. The CSAT trend shows variability over the observed months. The lowest CSAT of 64.86% was in May 2025, and the highest CSAT of 76.07% was in April 2025.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, influencing revenue strategies and menu optimization.
The overall average check for Hungry Howie's Pizza is $18.80, reflecting a 5.3% decrease year-over-year. Arizona leads with an average check of $25.40. The dynamic data shows that the average check was $18.16 in April 2025 and peaked at $19.35 in May 2025, before slightly decreasing to $18.73 in June 2025.
Number of outlets indicates brand's reach and expansion, shaping market dominance and accessibility.
Hungry Howie's Pizza has the most outlets in Michigan (200), followed by Florida (190). Arizona has 24 outlets, while North Carolina has 19. Other states with outlets include Alabama (13), Ohio (12), California (9), Texas (9), Utah (6), and Indiana (4).
Identifying key competitors helps refine market strategies and differentiate offerings to gain competitive edge.
The top competitors for Hungry Howie's Pizza, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (21.23%), Taco Bell (11.58%), Burger King (9.18%), Wendy's (8.24%), and Chick-fil-A (5.79%). This indicates a significant overlap in customer preferences with major fast-food chains.
Analyzing traffic workload by hours optimizes staffing and resource allocation to meet peak demand.
Traffic workload for Hungry Howie's Pizza peaks between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload observed between 5 PM and 6 PM (63.4%). There is significantly lower traffic during the early morning hours. The minimum traffic workload is observed at 7 AM (0.01).
Understanding consumer segments tailors marketing, enhancing relevance and resonance with different demographic groups.
Women (96) and Men (103) indexes show near-average gender representation among Hungry Howie's Pizza customers. Gen X (117) exhibits a high affinity. Gen Y (95) shows a slightly under-indexed affinity, and Gen Z (62) is significantly under-indexed.