Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Church's Texas Chicken is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Church's Texas Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Church's Texas Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Church's Texas Chicken' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Church's Texas Chicken' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Church's Texas Chicken holds a leading market position with a percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates strong customer preference. Performance peers include Pluckers Wing Bar, Charleys Cheesesteaks, Metro Diner, Miller's Ale House, bb.q Chicken, and Pizza Ranch.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty and revenue. Tracking CSAT helps identify areas for service and product improvement.
Church's Texas Chicken's overall CSAT is 52%, a slight increase of 0.5pp year-over-year. Nebraska shows the highest CSAT at 83% with decrease by 0.8pp, while Nevada is at 60% with decrease by 6.7pp. CSAT was between 49.58 and 53.50 during the observed period.
Average check reveals customer spending habits. Monitoring trends aids in pricing strategies and understanding customer value and potential revenue streams.
The overall average check for Church's Texas Chicken is $17.80, a 5% decrease year-over-year. Nebraska has the highest average check at $25.20. The average check fluctuated between $17.51 and $18.16 during the observed period.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion. Monitoring outlet distribution shows geographical strengths and areas for potential growth.
Church's Texas Chicken has 192 outlets in Texas, the highest number, followed by Puerto Rico with 108. California and Georgia have 26 and 24 outlets respectively, reflecting varied market penetration across states.
Identifying competitors shows brand's position in competitive landscape, informing strategies for differentiation and market share growth and insights into consumer choice.
McDonald's is the most cross-visited brand by Church's Texas Chicken customers (23.17%), followed by Burger King (11.69%), Wendy's (10.12%), Whataburger (7.92%), and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (7.88%).
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours and helps optimize staffing and resource allocation to enhance customer experience and operational efficiency.
Traffic workload for Church's Texas Chicken peaks between 10:00 AM and 9:00 PM, with the highest workload around 5:00 PM (71.99). The lowest traffic occurs between midnight and 6:00 AM.
Analyzing consumer segments by gender and generation informs targeted marketing, improving engagement and brand resonance with specific groups.
Women shows affinity index of 101, Men shows affinity index of 99. Gen X exhibits a high affinity (124), while Gen Y and Gen Z are under-indexed at 91 and 63, respectively. This suggests Gen X is highly engaged, while Gen Y and Z may need different strategies.