Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken holds a leading position with a percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates a strong market presence and significant customer preference compared to its peers like 230 Fifth Rooftop Bar, Crab Trap, Chicken Shack, Fish Tales, Ipoh Kitchen Asian Cuisine, and El Jefe's Taqueria, all positioned similarly.
Gauges customer happiness, directly impacting loyalty and repeat business. Higher satisfaction often correlates with positive word-of-mouth.
Customer satisfaction for Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken is high at 87%, with a 0.9 percentage point increase year-over-year. North Carolina shows similar satisfaction levels at 87%. CSAT fluctuated between 81.34 and 91.07 during the observed months, with a slight dip in May and June.
Indicates how much customers spend per visit, influencing overall revenue and profitability of the brand.
The average check for Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken is $22.50, a 13.8% increase year-over-year. North Carolina matches this average. The average check fluctuated between $21.39 and $23.48 during the observed months, indicating stable spending per customer.
Reflects brand's reach and growth. More outlets potentially mean greater market penetration and brand visibility.
Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken has 17 outlets in North Carolina. This indicates a focused regional presence with no apparent changes during the reporting period. This suggests a stable operational footprint in that state.
Understanding who brand's customers also visit reveals direct competitors and shared customer base, useful for strategic positioning.
The top competitors for Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (9.90%), Chick-fil-A (7.81%), Bojangles (7.29%), Starbucks (5.73%), and Wendy's (5.21%). These brands represent fast-food and coffee options that attract a similar customer base.
Traffic workload indicates peak hours, helping optimize staffing, manage resources, and reduce wait times.
Traffic workload at Alpaca Peruvian Charcoal Chicken peaks between 11:00 AM and 8:00 PM, with highest traffic around 1:00 PM (73.89%) and 6:00 PM (73.19%). There is virtually no traffic between 9:00 PM and 10:00 AM. This suggests operational hours focused around lunch and dinner services.
Consumer segments reveal core demographics, allowing targeted marketing and tailored offerings based on customer preferences.
Women (90%) have a high affinity, being slightly under-indexed, while men (109%) are over-indexed. Among generations, Gen X (122%) is highly over-indexed, Gen Y (99%) shows near-average affinity, and Gen Z (70%) is significantly under-indexed. Targeted campaigns should consider the preferences of Gen X males.