Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Seoul Garden performance in the Malaysia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Seoul Garden performance in the Malaysia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Seoul Garden' competitors in the Malaysia
An analysis of Seoul Garden' competitors in the Malaysia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Seoul Garden is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows a brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Seoul Garden is a leading brand in Malaysia's Cafe & Restaurants industry with a market performance percentile of 99, indicating it captures a significant portion of customer traffic and brand preference. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Souper Tang, Vivo Pizza, KyoChon 1991, Donkai, Dragon-i and AllAce.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting retention and revenue growth.
Seoul Garden's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is high at 95%, with a 2.3 percentage point increase year-over-year. Malacca shows the highest CSAT at 100%, while Terengganu recorded a slight decrease. These variations across states shows customer satisfaction differences in regions.
Average check (AvgCheck) measures customer spending per visit, indicating pricing strategy effectiveness and customer value.
Seoul Garden's overall average check is 75.1 MYR, with a 3.1% increase year-over-year. Johor has the highest average check at 84.2 MYR. Sarawak, Penang, Malacca and Pahang have a lower average check. Average Check fluctuated through the months, with a peak in May 2025.
Number of outlets signifies market reach and brand accessibility, affecting customer convenience and revenue potential.
Seoul Garden has a total of 35 outlets in Malaysia. Selangor has the highest number of outlets (9), followed by Sarawak and Johor (4 each). Other states have fewer outlets, showing geographic concentration.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies and market positioning.
Seoul Garden's top competitors based on cross-visitation are KFC (5.20%), Sushi King (4.62%), McDonald's (4.33%), K Fry Urban Korean (3.27%), and 4Fingers Crispy Chicken (2.98%). This data highlights the fast-food and casual dining brands frequently visited by Seoul Garden's customers.
Traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing and operations to meet peak demand and improve customer service.
Seoul Garden experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 and 21:00, with the highest activity around 14:00-19:00. Traffic is minimal between midnight and 10:00. This data is to optimize staffing and resource allocation based on hourly demand.
Consumer segment analysis informs targeted marketing by understanding demographic preferences and behaviors.
Seoul Garden's customer base shows affinity towards women (index 116) more than men (index 87). The Gen Z segment (index 131) is overrepresented, while Gen X (index 58) is underrepresented, and Gen Y (index 99) are average represented in relation to the average consumer.