Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Seasons 52 performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Seasons 52 performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Seasons 52' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Seasons 52' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Seasons 52 is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market Performance reveals the brand's share of foot traffic, showing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Seasons 52's Market Performance stands at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position. This high percentile means the brand significantly outperforms most competitors in attracting customer traffic. Its peers include 54th Street, Frontera Mexican Kitchen, Haidilao Hot Pot, Drake's, Skyline Chili, and Guadalajara's Grill, all positioned in the 99th percentile range.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is crucial for brand loyalty and repeat business. Tracking CSAT helps understand customer sentiment and identify areas for improvement.
Seasons 52 demonstrates high customer satisfaction with an overall CSAT score of 91%, a 2 percentage point increase year-over-year. Arizona and Indiana show the highest CSAT at 95%. Virginia experienced a decrease in satisfaction. The dynamic data shows CSAT fluctuating between 89.81% and 91.55% during the reporting period.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit. Monitoring it helps in revenue forecasting, menu optimization, and assessing pricing strategies.
Seasons 52's overall average check is $52.70, up 1.3% year-over-year. Arizona has the highest average check at $62.90. Dynamic data reveals fluctuations in average check, ranging from $51.56 to $54.32 during the reporting period.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market penetration. Tracking changes informs expansion strategies and identifies geographic strengths.
Seasons 52 has the highest number of outlets in Florida (11), followed by New Jersey (6). Texas and Illinois each have 3 outlets. Other states have fewer locations, showing regional concentration of the brand.
Understanding key competitors helps refine strategies, identify market opportunities, and improve customer retention.
Seasons 52's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (6.20%), Starbucks (4.59%), Chick-fil-A (4.44%), The Cheesecake Factory (3.27%), and Texas Roadhouse (3.03%). This shows customers who visit Seasons 52 also frequent these establishments.
Analyzing traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing, manage resources, and enhance customer experience during peak times.
Seasons 52 experiences peak traffic workload between 17:00 (5 PM) and 19:00 (7 PM), with the highest workload at 18:00 (6 PM). Traffic gradually increases from 11:00 AM and declines significantly after 21:00 (9 PM). There is virtually no traffic between midnight and 10:00 AM.
Consumer segment analysis enables targeted marketing by understanding demographic preferences, enhancing ad relevance and ROI.
Seasons 52's customer base shows a higher affinity towards women (96) compared to men (103). Among generations, Gen X exhibits the highest affinity (144), while Gen Y (70) and Gen Z (46) are under-indexed. This means Gen X is overrepresented compared to average.