Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Quickly performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Quickly performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Quickly is in the lower 31% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
An analysis of Quickly' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Quickly' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals brand's share of foot traffic, indicating competitive strength and customer preference.
Quickly's market performance is in the lower 31%, indicating a below average market standing. Performance peers include Mike’s Superior Deli and Grill, Northern China Eatery (Beltline), Cap City Fine Diner and Bar, Daiquiri Deck, The Empanada's, and Creole House Restaurant & Oyster Bar.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer loyalty and brand perception, directly impacting revenue and long-term growth.
Quickly's overall CSAT is 76%, a slight increase of 0.6 percentage points year-over-year. Arizona shows the highest CSAT at 100%, while Florida and Michigan experienced CSAT decreases. The CSAT trend fluctuated between 64.95 and 81.56 during the observed period.
Average check (AvgCheck) indicates spending per customer, crucial for revenue optimization and understanding customer purchasing behavior.
Quickly's overall average check is $11.90, a 9% decrease year-over-year. California has an average check of $9.40 USD with no growth. The average check remained constant at $13.13 throughout the observed period.
Number of outlets reflects brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and overall revenue potential.
Quickly has 48 outlets in California, dominating its presence. Other states with outlets include Georgia (3), Alabama (2), Florida (2), Michigan (2), New York (2), Arizona (1), Colorado (1), Utah (1), and North Carolina (1).
Identifying competitors helps refine strategies, understand market dynamics, and capture market share effectively.
Quickly's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (14.89%), Starbucks (10.64%), In-N-Out Burger (9.57%), Olive Garden Italian Restaurant (5.32%), and Taco Bell (5.32%).
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, enhancing customer experience and operational efficiency.
Quickly experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload around 4 PM (60.33%). Traffic is minimal during the early morning hours (12 AM to 9 AM).
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, improving engagement and ROI by tailoring strategies to specific groups.
Quickly's customer base shows a higher affinity towards women (116) compared to men (85). Gen Z (153) and Gen Y (121) are overrepresented, while Gen X (66) is underrepresented.