Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence PROTEINHOUSE performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence PROTEINHOUSE performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of PROTEINHOUSE' competitors in the United States
An analysis of PROTEINHOUSE' competitors in the United States
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
PROTEINHOUSE is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's share of foot traffic, showing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
PROTEINHOUSE's market performance is in the top 1% (99th percentile), marking it as a leading brand. This high percentile indicates a strong market standing relative to competitors like Halal Food Express, The Eatery at Bigfork, Duke's Roadhouse, El Churry, Delicious Indian Cuisine & Bar, and Becky's Diner, which are also in a similar top percentile range.
Customer satisfaction is crucial for brand loyalty, reflecting how well PROTEINHOUSE meets customer expectations and identifying areas for service improvement.
PROTEINHOUSE's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 73%, a decrease of 4.6 percentage points year-over-year. North Dakota shows the highest CSAT at 93% with an increase of 2.4 percentage points, while Wisconsin's CSAT is 89% with a decrease of 6.8 percentage points. Iowa, Nevada and Massachusetts also demonstrate high CSAT with improvements.
Average check measures customer spending per visit, critical for revenue forecasting and understanding pricing effectiveness.
The overall average check for PROTEINHOUSE is $22, reflecting a 9.5% decrease year-over-year. Iowa shows the highest average check at $23.6 USD. Texas and Arizona also showed strong average check values. No growth in average check was observed across the states analyzed.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market penetration, influencing accessibility and overall revenue potential.
PROTEINHOUSE has multiple outlets across the United States, with Arizona having the most (3). Texas and Nevada each have 2 outlets, while Iowa, Massachusetts, Florida, Kansas, Wisconsin, North Dakota, and California each have 1 outlet. This distribution reflects PROTEINHOUSE's presence across various states.
Identifying competitors helps refine strategies and understand the competitive landscape and customer preferences.
PROTEINHOUSE's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's and Chipotle Mexican Grill (both at 7.97%), followed by Chick-fil-A, In-N-Out Burger, and Starbucks (all at 5.07%). This shows PROTEINHOUSE customers also frequent these popular cafe and restaurant chains.
Analyzing traffic workload by hour identifies peak times, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation.
Traffic workload for PROTEINHOUSE peaks around noon (12:00 PM) at 74.29%. Traffic gradually increases from 7:00 AM (20.10%) to midday, then decreases through the afternoon and evening. There is no traffic during late night and early morning hours.
Analyzing consumer segments helps tailor marketing efforts and product offerings to specific demographic groups.
PROTEINHOUSE's consumer base shows a strong affinity towards women (83%) and Gen Z (204%). Men are also represented (116%) and Gen X shows affinity as well (108%), while Gen Y is under-indexed (85%). This suggests high engagement from women and Gen Z relative to the average consumer.