Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Main Squeeze Juice Co. performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Main Squeeze Juice Co. performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Main Squeeze Juice Co.' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Main Squeeze Juice Co.' competitors in the United States
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Main Squeeze Juice Co. is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the cafe & restaurants industry.
Main Squeeze Juice Co. is a leading brand in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States, securing a top 1% market performance. This position signifies strong customer preference and competitive strength, alongside peers like Home Slice Pizza and Boulder Tap House.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how happy customers are with a brand's products and services, impacting loyalty and brand reputation.
Main Squeeze Juice Co.'s overall CSAT is 91%, a decrease of 2.8 percentage points year-over-year. Tennessee shows the highest CSAT at 94% with a 2.2 percentage point increase, while Georgia shows the lowest CSAT at 90% with a decrease of 7.9 percentage points.
Average check reveals how much customers spend per visit, influencing overall revenue and profitability for Main Squeeze Juice Co.
Main Squeeze Juice Co.'s overall average check is $19.80, down 1.4% year-over-year. Texas has the highest average check at $22.40. Missouri is at $17.20, and Tennessee has the lowest at $15.70. These variances may reflect regional pricing or product mix differences.
Number of outlets indicates brand's physical presence and potential market reach, influencing overall revenue and customer accessibility.
Main Squeeze Juice Co. has the most outlets in Texas (10), followed by Louisiana (8). Missouri has 2 outlets, while Mississippi, Arizona, Tennessee, and Georgia each have 1 outlet. Outlet count reflects geographic focus and expansion strategy.
Competitor analysis identifies key players attracting similar customers, informing competitive strategies and market positioning for Main Squeeze Juice Co.
The top competitors for Main Squeeze Juice Co., based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (4.76%), Dutch Bros Coffee (3.81%), Wingstop (3.81%), Raising Cane's (2.86%), and Chick-fil-A (2.86%). These brands attract a portion of Main Squeeze's customer base.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, enabling staffing and resource optimization to meet customer demand effectively for Main Squeeze Juice Co.
Main Squeeze Juice Co. experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 4 PM, with the highest workload around noon (59.45%). Traffic is minimal before 7 AM and after 7 PM. Staffing should align with peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments informs targeted marketing, product development, and brand positioning strategies for Main Squeeze Juice Co.
Women (140 affinity index) are overrepresented among Main Squeeze Juice Co. customers, while men (63 affinity index) are underrepresented. Gen Y (135 affinity index) shows high affinity, whereas Gen X (79 affinity index) and Gen Z (45 affinity index) are underrepresented.