Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Little Greek Fresh Grill performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Little Greek Fresh Grill performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Little Greek Fresh Grill' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Little Greek Fresh Grill' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Little Greek Fresh Grill is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's foot traffic share, reflecting competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Little Greek Fresh Grill's market performance is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position. This means the brand outperforms most competitors in attracting customers. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Le Sorelle Restaurant, Abuelo's Mexican Restaurant, Rancherito's Mexican Food, Desi District, Pirate's Table Calabash Seafood Buffet, and OLIO E PIÙ.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects loyalty and predicts repeat business. High CSAT indicates effective customer service and product quality.
Little Greek Fresh Grill has an overall CSAT of 83%, a 5.3 percentage point increase year-over-year. Ohio leads with 100% satisfaction, followed by Arkansas (98%), Texas (88%), and Florida (83%). Illinois shows a decrease in CSAT at 78%. The CSAT trend fluctuated between 80.12% and 87.46% from May to July 2025.
Average check reveals customer spending habits. Monitoring it helps optimize pricing strategies and identify revenue growth opportunities.
The overall average check for Little Greek Fresh Grill is $17.70, an 8% decrease year-over-year. Florida and Texas both have an average check of $17.80. Illinois has an average check of $16.70, while Arkansas stands at $13.80. The average check fluctuated between $17.02 and $18.91 from May to July 2025.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and expansion. A growing outlet count suggests strong brand performance and investment.
Little Greek Fresh Grill has 34 outlets in Florida, 10 in Texas, and 2 each in Illinois and Arkansas. Ohio and Kentucky each have 1 outlet. Florida represents the largest share of the brand's presence in the United States.
Competitor analysis helps identify key rivals and understand competitive dynamics, informing strategic decisions for market positioning.
Top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (6%), Chick-fil-A (4.67%), Wendy's (4.22%), Starbucks (4%), and Chipotle Mexican Grill (3.78%). These brands attract a significant portion of Little Greek Fresh Grill's customer base.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, ensuring efficient operations during peak hours.
Peak traffic hours for Little Greek Fresh Grill are between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload between 12 PM and 2 PM. Traffic significantly decreases after 8 PM, with minimal activity between 9 PM and 10 AM.
Analyzing consumer segments helps tailor marketing efforts. Understanding gender and generational preferences drives effective communication.
Women show high affinity (98) for Little Greek Fresh Grill, while men are slightly over-indexed (102). Gen X has very high affinity (136), whereas Gen Y (78) and Gen Z (66) are under-indexed compared to the average consumer.