Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Kroger performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Kroger performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Kroger' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Kroger' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Kroger is in the lower 34% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Kroger's market performance is in the lower 34%, indicating a below-average market standing. This means Kroger captures less foot traffic compared to most competitors. Performance peers include Barlume Downstairs, Suzie's Pastry Shoppe, Moonlight Diner, Nic & Norman's, Pinewood, and Budweiser Brickhouse Tavern.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty and brand reputation, crucial for sustained growth.
Kroger's overall CSAT is 71%, a slight increase of 0.5 percentage points year-over-year. Georgia and Michigan show high CSAT (84% and 82% respectively), while Texas lags at 64%. The CSAT trend increased from June to August 2025, peaking at 79.59%.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, crucial for revenue forecasting and profitability analysis.
Kroger's overall average check is $34.30, a decrease of 12.5% year-over-year. Michigan has the highest average check at $55.40, while Ohio's is $21.40. The average check decreased significantly from June to July 2025.
Outlet count indicates market reach and brand presence, influencing accessibility and potential customer base.
Kroger has the most outlets in Ohio (164), followed by Georgia (131) and Texas (111). This distribution highlights key markets for Kroger's physical presence across the United States.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, informing strategies to gain market share and customer loyalty.
Kroger's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (32.14%), Taco Bell (15.31%), Wendy's (14.29%), Burger King (12.24%), and Chick-fil-A (9.69%). This indicates customers who visit Kroger also frequently visit these fast-food chains.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation based on peak customer activity times.
Kroger experiences peak traffic workload between 6 AM and 6 PM, with the highest activity around 4 PM to 5 PM (57.49%). Traffic is significantly lower during overnight hours.
Consumer segment analysis enables targeted marketing by understanding demographic preferences and behaviors.
Women are over-represented among Kroger's consumers (88 affinity index), while men are even more over-represented (111 affinity index). Gen X shows a high affinity (149), while Gen Y (65) and Gen Z (87) are under-indexed.