Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Currito is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Currito performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Currito performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Currito' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Currito' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals brand’s share of foot traffic, reflecting competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Currito holds a market performance percentile of 98, placing it in a leading position. This indicates a strong brand presence and high customer preference compared to other Cafe & Restaurants brands in the United States. Currito's performance peers include Bowls N Go / Healthy Foods, Umiya Sushi, MiLina, Pho Ben, Taste of India, and Rainbow Drive-In, all at the same level.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) indicates loyalty, influencing repurchase rates and brand advocacy, reflecting overall brand health.
Currito's overall CSAT is 66%, a 14.5 percentage point decrease year-over-year. CSAT varies by state, with Kentucky showing high satisfaction (96%) and Florida showing low satisfaction (49%). This suggests inconsistent customer experiences across different locations. The trend shows fluctuations in CSAT over the reported months.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, crucial for revenue and profitability assessment.
Currito's overall average check is $19, a 21.1% increase year-over-year. The average check varies by state, with Illinois at $22.5 and Ohio at $16.3. These variations may reflect differences in menu pricing, customer preferences, or regional economic factors. Average check shows fluctuations during the observed period.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and potential market penetration, influencing accessibility and brand visibility.
Currito has a total of 23 outlets across the United States, concentrated primarily in Ohio (10 outlets) and Illinois (4 outlets). The distribution of outlets reflects Currito's current market presence and expansion strategy, indicating regional focus within the US.
Identifying top competitors aids in benchmarking, strategic positioning, and understanding competitive dynamics within the industry.
Currito's top competitors based on cross-visitation include McDonald's (10.98%), Chick-fil-A (7.32%), Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers (6.10%), Wendy's (6.10%), and Olive Garden Italian Restaurant (6.10%). These brands represent the alternative choices Currito's customers consider.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation based on peak hours, ensuring efficient operations.
Currito's traffic workload peaks between 11 AM and 6 PM, with the highest workload around 12 PM (64.54). This data suggests the need for increased staffing and resource allocation during these hours to meet customer demand and maintain service quality.
Consumer segment analysis informs targeted marketing, product development, and customized customer experiences for higher engagement.
Currito's customer base shows an over-representation of women (affinity index of 106) and an under-representation of men (affinity index of 95) . Gen Y (affinity index of 130) are over-represented, while Gen Z (affinity index of 27) are notably under-represented. This shows affinity indexes relative to the average.