Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Crave Cookies performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Crave Cookies performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Crave Cookies is in the lower 38% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
An analysis of Crave Cookies' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Crave Cookies' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Crave Cookies is in the lower 38% of brands, indicating a lagging market position. This means the brand captures less foot traffic compared to competitors. Performance peers in similar position: Federales Denver, Karizma Lounge, The Hyderabad Indian Grill, Melty, Pizza Tua, Riviera Maya Restaurant.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty, brand reputation, and revenue growth.
Crave Cookies has a high overall CSAT of 94%, a 1.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. Texas shows the highest CSAT at 99%, while Florida and Washington show a decrease in CSAT. Indiana shows the highest growth in CSAT.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, crucial for revenue and profitability analysis.
The overall average check for Crave Cookies is $12.30, a 9.7% decrease year-over-year. Texas maintains an average check of $12.30. The average check varied between $10.16 and $19.58 during the observed period.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and growth potential.
Crave Cookies has a total of 21 outlets. Illinois has the highest number of outlets (6), followed by Florida and Utah (3 each). Colorado and Indiana have 2 outlets each, while Tennessee, Washington, Georgia, New Jersey and Arizona have 1 each.
Identifying top competitors helps refine strategies, understand market dynamics, and improve competitive positioning.
The top competitors for Crave Cookies, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (11.49%), Dunkin' (5.75%), Starbucks (4.60%), Burger King (4.60%), and Subway (4.60%). This indicates a significant overlap in customer base with major fast-food chains.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation.
Crave Cookies experiences peak traffic workload between 10 AM and 8 PM, with the highest traffic around 5 PM (55.21). Traffic is minimal during early morning hours (0-6 AM).
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, improving engagement and ROI.
Women show a high affinity (123 index) for Crave Cookies, while men are under-indexed (78 index). Gen Z shows a very high affinity (220 index), while Gen X (97 index) and Gen Y (96 index) are slightly under-indexed.