Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Burgerville performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Burgerville performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Burgerville' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Burgerville' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Burgerville is right in the middle
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Burgerville's market performance is at the 48th percentile, indicating a below average/lagging position. This means Burgerville captures less foot traffic than most competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Pappa Gallo and The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty and brand reputation, crucial for sustained growth.
Burgerville's overall CSAT is 66%, a decrease of 3.3 percentage points year-over-year. Washington state shows a CSAT of 68%, while Oregon is at 65%. The downward trend suggests a need to address customer concerns to improve satisfaction.
Average check reveals how much customers spend per visit, influencing revenue and profitability strategies.
Burgerville's overall average check is $17.00, a 2.8% increase year-over-year. Washington has an average check of $17.90, while Oregon is at $16.50. The increase indicates customers are spending slightly more per visit.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and revenue potential.
Burgerville has 28 outlets in Oregon and 13 in Washington. This distribution highlights a stronger presence in Oregon, suggesting potential for expansion in Washington.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, informing strategies to gain market share and customer loyalty.
Burgerville's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (12.99%), Taco Bell (7.96%), Dutch Bros Coffee (6.01%), Starbucks (5.73%), and Wendy's (5.03%). These brands attract a significant portion of Burgerville's customer base.
Traffic workload shows peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
Burgerville experiences peak traffic between 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, with the highest workload at 81.06. Traffic starts increasing significantly from 7:00 AM, peaking around lunchtime, and remains high until the evening.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, improving engagement and brand resonance.
Burgerville's customer base shows a high affinity towards women (84), indicating they are overrepresented. Men are also overrepresented (115). Gen X shows a high affinity (134), while Gen Y (79) and Gen Z (55) are underrepresented.