Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Zip's Drive In is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Zip's Drive In performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Zip's Drive In performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Zip's Drive In' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Zip's Drive In' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Zip's Drive In holds a leading market performance with a percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates a strong market position relative to competitors like Mama Margies Mexican Restaurant, K&W Cafeteria, Red Cow, Frisco Diner, F1 Arcade, and Amalfi Cucina & Mercato, all positioned within a similar performance bracket.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, crucial for repeat business and positive word-of-mouth, thus impacting revenue.
Zip's Drive In shows an overall customer satisfaction of 67%, a 5.6 percentage point increase year-over-year. Washington state exhibits a higher CSAT (68%) with a significant increase, while Idaho shows a decrease. The CSAT dynamic data shows volatility between April and June 2025, indicating inconsistent satisfaction levels.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, crucial for understanding revenue streams and identifying upselling opportunities.
Zip's Drive In's overall average check is $16.2, a decrease of 11.2% year-over-year. Idaho has a higher average check ($18) compared to Washington ($15.7). The average check dynamic data shows slight fluctuations between April and June 2025.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market penetration, impacting accessibility and overall revenue potential.
Zip's Drive In has 20 outlets in Washington and 8 in Idaho. This shows a stronger presence in Washington, potentially indicating a more established market or strategic focus in that state.
Competitor analysis helps to understand market dynamics, benchmark performance, and identify opportunities for differentiation.
Zip's Drive In's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (18.78%), Taco Bell (11.68%), Wendy's (8.63%), Dairy Queen (8.12%), and Panda Express (6.60%). This indicates that Zip's Drive In customers also frequently visit these fast-food chains.
Traffic workload shows peak hours and customer flow, allowing for efficient staffing and resource allocation to maximize sales.
Zip's Drive In experiences peak traffic workload between 12 PM and 2 PM (69.85% and 69.99% respectively), indicating lunchtime is the busiest period. Traffic gradually increases from 7 AM, with minimal activity before that. There is another peak around 4-6 PM.
Analyzing consumer segments allows targeted marketing and positioning by understanding demographics and preferences.
Zip's Drive In customer base shows a higher affinity towards women (87%), while men are overrepresented (111%). Among generations, Gen X shows a slight overrepresentation (102%), while Gen Y (93%) and Gen Z (78%) are underrepresented.