Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Tacos 4 Life is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Tacos 4 Life performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Tacos 4 Life performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Tacos 4 Life' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Tacos 4 Life' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows the brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Tacos 4 Life is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1%. This indicates a strong market presence and customer preference compared to its peers: Chin Chin, Chicken Guy!, Which Wich Superior Sandwiches, Roti Grill, Kobe Revolving Sushi, and Plaza Bonita Restaurant, all positioned within the same leading percentile range.
Customer satisfaction reflects customer loyalty and brand perception, directly impacting revenue and long-term success.
Tacos 4 Life has an overall customer satisfaction of 84%, a decrease of 3.1 percentage points year-over-year. Virginia shows the highest CSAT at 98% but with a decrease. North Carolina and Missouri show an increase in CSAT. Kansas and Texas show a decrease. Recent CSAT data shows fluctuations month to month, from 83.99% in April to 82.20% in June 2025.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, influencing revenue and profitability analysis.
The overall average check for Tacos 4 Life is $15.90, a decrease of 0.8% year-over-year. Tennessee has the highest average check at $18.60. Virginia's average check is $16.90, and North Carolina's is $15.90. Recent average check data shows a fluctuation from $15.12 in April to $16.83 in June 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market penetration, essential for growth strategy assessment.
Tacos 4 Life has the most outlets in Arkansas (10). North Carolina has 5, Missouri has 4, Oklahoma and Tennessee have 2 each, and Texas, Virginia and Kansas has 1 each.
Competitive analysis helps identify key rivals and understand customer preferences for strategic positioning.
The top competitors for Tacos 4 Life, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (9.94%), Taco Bell (6.63%), Sonic Drive-In (6.63%), Chick-fil-A (6.02%), and Chipotle Mexican Grill (4.22%). This suggests that customers who visit Tacos 4 Life also frequent these fast-food and fast-casual restaurants.
Traffic workload analysis identifies peak hours and optimizes staffing for better customer experience.
Traffic at Tacos 4 Life peaks between 11 AM and 7 PM, with the highest workload at 12 PM (63.40%). There is minimal traffic before 10 AM and after 9 PM. Staffing should be optimized during peak hours to handle the increased customer volume.
Consumer segments provide demographic insights for tailored marketing and product development strategies.
Women have high affinity, indicated by an affinity index of 96. Men also have high affinity, indexed at 104. Gen X is overrepresented (117), while Gen Y (87) and Gen Z (71) are underrepresented, suggesting a need to better engage these younger demographics.