Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Sharks Fish & Chicken is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Sharks Fish & Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sharks Fish & Chicken performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Sharks Fish & Chicken' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Sharks Fish & Chicken' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's share of foot traffic, showing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Sharks Fish & Chicken has a market performance percentile of 98, indicating a leading position. This places it in the top 2% of brands, demonstrating strong customer preference. Performance peers include Turmerica By Tanvi Modi, Shahs of Kabob, Michael's Seafood Restaurant, Cookout, Taco Bus, and El Pollo Inka Miami.
CSAT reflects customer happiness, influencing loyalty and brand perception, impacting repeat business and word-of-mouth referrals.
Overall customer satisfaction for Sharks Fish & Chicken is 53%, a decrease of 5.5 percentage points year-over-year. Illinois shows 53% satisfaction with a decrease of 7.9 percentage points, while Indiana shows 47% with an increase of 4.2 percentage points. This suggests regional differences in customer experience.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, reflecting menu pricing, order size, and customer purchasing behavior.
The overall average check for Sharks Fish & Chicken is $21.30, a decrease of 2.6% year-over-year. Illinois shows an average check of $21.20 USD with no change. The dynamic average check data shows variability across the months, peaking in June 2025.
Outlet count shows brand reach and expansion, crucial for market presence and revenue generation across different locations.
Sharks Fish & Chicken has 21 outlets in Illinois and 2 outlets in Indiana. The distribution indicates a strong presence in Illinois, with a smaller footprint in Indiana, highlighting regional concentration of the brand's operations.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, guiding strategic positioning and highlighting competitive threats and opportunities.
The top competitors for Sharks Fish & Chicken based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (18.87%), Portillo's (11.32%), Wendy's (11.32%), Burger King (11.32%), and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (9.43%). This indicates that customers of Sharks Fish & Chicken also frequently visit these fast-food chains.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, enabling optimized staffing and resource allocation for enhanced customer experience.
Traffic workload for Sharks Fish & Chicken peaks between 16:00 and 18:00, with the highest traffic workload at 60.09%. There is no traffic between 4:00 and 9:00. This information is valuable for staffing and operational planning to meet customer demand during peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments allows targeted marketing, improving engagement and brand resonance by aligning with specific group preferences.
Women (104) and Gen Y (117) and Gen Z (129) are overrepresented among Sharks Fish & Chicken consumers, indicating a high affinity. Men are slightly underrepresented (97), while Gen X is underrepresented (78). Marketing efforts should focus on the preferences of Women, Gen Y, and Gen Z.