Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Señor Frog's is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Señor Frog's performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Señor Frog's performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Señor Frog's' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Señor Frog's' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals competitive strength and customer preference in the industry, showing brand's share of foot traffic.
Señor Frog's is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99 in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States. This indicates a strong market standing relative to competitors like Paula Deen's Family Kitchen, Costco Food Court, Abelardo's Mexican Fresh, Eat'n Park, Ojos Locos Sports Cantina, and Ume Tea, all positioned at the 99th percentile.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty. Monitoring CSAT helps identify areas for service improvement and maintain a competitive edge.
Señor Frog's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 72%, a decrease of 2.7 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT in Florida is 72%, with a decrease of 4.5 percentage points, while South Carolina shows 67% with a 3.5 percentage point increase. This indicates varying customer experiences across locations.
Average check tracks customer spending per visit, directly influencing revenue. Monitoring changes informs pricing and promotional strategies.
Señor Frog's overall average check is $41.70, a decrease of 2.5% year-over-year. The average check in Florida is $43.70, while in South Carolina it is $31.60. These figures suggest regional differences in spending habits.
Outlet count indicates market reach and expansion. Tracking changes helps understand brand growth and geographic focus.
Señor Frog's has 5 outlets in Florida and 1 in South Carolina. This distribution highlights Florida as a primary market for the brand within the United States.
Understanding key competitors through cross-visitation patterns helps refine marketing and identify opportunities to capture market share.
Customers of Señor Frog's also frequent McDonald's (8.07%), Wendy's (4.32%), Chick-fil-A (4.13%), Starbucks (3.75%), and Sharky's Beachfront Restaurant (3.38%). This overlap indicates potential competition for customer visits.
Analyzing traffic workload by hour reveals peak business times, enabling optimized staffing and resource allocation for better service.
Señor Frog's experiences peak traffic workload between 7 PM and 9 PM, with the highest workload at 9 PM (42.69-44.69%). Traffic is minimal between 2 AM and 9 AM, highlighting the brand's evening-focused activity.
Understanding consumer segments by Gender and Generation informs targeted marketing. Affinity insights can refine positioning strategies.
Women show a high affinity (120) for Señor Frog's, while Men are under-indexed (83). Gen Y demonstrates an affinity (110), while Gen X (99) and Gen Z (96) are slightly under-indexed. This suggests a stronger appeal to female and Gen Y consumers.