Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Seasons 52 is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Seasons 52 performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Seasons 52 performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Seasons 52' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Seasons 52' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals a brand's share of foot traffic, indicating its competitive strength and customer preference.
Seasons 52 holds a leading market position, ranking in the top 1% among Cafe & Restaurants in the United States. This indicates strong customer preference and competitive advantage. Performance peers include Tacky Jacks, PLANTA Queen, Landshark Bar & Grill, Wunsche Bros. Cafe & Saloon, Bar Louie, Kung Fu Tea which are in the same percentile range.
CSAT reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty and brand reputation. High CSAT scores often correlate with repeat business and positive word-of-mouth.
Seasons 52 exhibits a high level of customer satisfaction, with an overall CSAT score of 90%, reflecting a 2.3 percentage point increase year-over-year. Colorado shows the highest CSAT at 97%, with Arizona, Indiana, North Carolina and Maryland also demonstrating high satisfaction levels.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, crucial for revenue forecasting and menu optimization. Higher average checks can boost profitability.
Seasons 52's average check is $52.2, reflecting a slight decrease of 0.8% year-over-year. Colorado has the highest average check at $60.8 USD. This indicates variations in customer spending across different states, which can relate to menu pricing and items purchased.
Outlet count shows brand reach and growth. More outlets often mean greater market presence and accessibility to customers.
Seasons 52 has 11 outlets in Florida, the most in the United States. New Jersey has 6 outlets, while Illinois, California, and Texas each have 3. This distribution reflects the brand's strategic focus on specific regional markets.
Analyzing competitors reveals market dynamics and helps brands identify opportunities to differentiate and capture market share.
Seasons 52's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation include McDonald's (6.43%), Starbucks (4.15%), Dunkin' (3.07%), The Cheesecake Factory (3.01%), and Chick-fil-A (2.67%). This indicates that Seasons 52's customers also frequent quick-service and casual dining establishments.
Understanding traffic patterns enables efficient staffing and resource allocation, optimizing customer experience and operational efficiency.
Seasons 52 experiences peak traffic workload between 5 PM and 7 PM (hod 17-19), with the highest workload at 6 PM (61.48). Traffic is minimal between midnight and 10 AM, indicating the restaurant's primary business hours are during lunch and dinner.
Consumer segment data informs targeted marketing, tailoring products and messages to specific groups, maximizing engagement and ROI.
Seasons 52 customer base demonstrates a higher affinity towards women (101%) than men (99%). Gen X shows a high affinity (136%), while Gen Y (77%) and Gen Z (54%) are under-indexed. This suggests a stronger representation and affinity towards the older generations compared to younger ones.