Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Ono Hawaiian BBQ is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Ono Hawaiian BBQ performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Ono Hawaiian BBQ performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Ono Hawaiian BBQ' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Ono Hawaiian BBQ' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Ono Hawaiian BBQ's market performance is in the top 1% making it a leading brand. This high percentile signifies strong customer preference and competitive strength compared to peers like The Taj Cafe, Taco Bueno, Mordisco Miami, Sixty Vines, Crust Pizza Co., and Pappa Gallo.
Customer satisfaction is vital as it reflects customer loyalty, impacts brand reputation, and drives revenue growth through repeat business and positive referrals.
Ono Hawaiian BBQ's overall customer satisfaction is 68%, a decrease of 0.5 percentage points year-over-year. California shows higher satisfaction at 73% with a 1.2 percentage point increase, while Arizona shows a decrease to 60% with a decline of 2.4 percentage points.
Average check reveals spending patterns. Analyzing trends aids menu optimization, targeted promotions, and overall revenue strategy improvements.
Ono Hawaiian BBQ's overall average check is $20.90, a decrease of 7.7% year-over-year. California's average check is $21.10 with no growth, while Arizona's is $20.30 also with no growth. The decrease indicates customers are spending less per visit.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence. Growth signifies expansion; stagnation or decline may signal market saturation or strategic realignment.
Ono Hawaiian BBQ has 98 outlets in California and 17 in Arizona. The distribution highlights a strong presence in California, while Arizona has considerably fewer locations, indicating a smaller footprint in that state.
Understanding top competitors reveals market dynamics and cross-visitation patterns, crucial for strategic positioning and customer retention initiatives.
Ono Hawaiian BBQ's customers also frequently visit McDonald's (17.44%), In-N-Out Burger (13.55%), Starbucks (10.19%), Jack in the Box (8.82%), and Taco Bell (6.62%). This cross-visitation data highlights the competitive landscape and shared customer base.
Traffic workload analysis pinpoints peak hours, enabling optimized staffing, efficient resource allocation, and strategies to manage customer flow effectively.
Ono Hawaiian BBQ experiences peak traffic between 11:00 AM and 8:00 PM, with the highest workload around 6:00 PM (71.11%). Traffic is minimal during early morning hours (0:00 AM - 10:00 AM), indicating the need to adjust resources accordingly.
Analyzing consumer segments informs targeted marketing and positioning. Gender and generational affinity insights enable tailored strategies for enhanced engagement.
Ono Hawaiian BBQ's customer base shows a high affinity towards women (index of 90) and men (index of 108), and Gen X (index of 112). Gen Y (index of 94) and Gen Z (index of 89) are under-indexed, suggesting a lower affinity compared to average consumers.