Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Native Grill & Wings is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Native Grill & Wings performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Native Grill & Wings performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Native Grill & Wings' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Native Grill & Wings' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals competitive strength and customer preference in the industry, based on foot traffic share.
Native Grill & Wings holds a leading market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates strong customer preference compared to peers like Mazzio's Italian Eatery, Unconventional Diner, Agave Bandido, Yoshinoya, Kuppanna and Bruno's of Brooklyn, who also hold a 99 percentile.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception, influencing loyalty and repeat business in the competitive restaurant industry.
Native Grill & Wings exhibits a customer satisfaction rate of 76%, an increase of 10.8 percentage points year-over-year. Satisfaction in Arizona is also 76%, reflecting a growth of 8.5 percentage points. The CSAT trend varied between April and June of 2025, between 68.38% and 78.46%.
Average check indicates customer spending habits, influencing revenue and profitability in the cafe and restaurant sector.
Native Grill & Wings shows an overall average check of $27.5, a decrease of 1% year-over-year. The average check in Arizona is $27.5 USD, with no growth. The average check in 2025 varied between April and June, ranging from $23.11 to $30.08.
Outlet count signifies market reach and brand presence, crucial for expanding customer access and brand visibility.
Native Grill & Wings has 20 outlets in the United States. 19 are located in Arizona, and 1 in Texas. This indicates a strong concentration of outlets in Arizona and a smaller presence in Texas.
Competitor analysis reveals market dynamics, guiding strategies for differentiation and customer retention amid competition.
McDonald's shows the highest cross-visitation rate (12.85%), followed by Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers, Taco Bell, Denny's, which each have a cross visitation rate of 5.96%, and Wendy's (5.64%). This indicates that customers of Native Grill & Wings also frequently visit these competitors.
Traffic workload distribution informs staffing, inventory, and marketing strategies to optimize operations during peak hours.
Traffic workload peaks between 17:00 and 19:00, reaching up to 57.23, while the lowest workload occurs between 0:00 and 8:00. This highlights the need for adequate staffing and resource allocation during peak evening hours.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing and product positioning, improving customer engagement and ROI.
Women are over-represented (94) compared to average consumer, whereas men are over-represented (106). Gen X has the highest affinity (144), while Gen Y (75) and Gen Z (70) have lower affinity, suggesting different engagement levels.