Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Louisiana is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Louisiana performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Louisiana performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Louisiana' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Louisiana' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Louisiana's market performance is in the top 1% making it a leading brand. This indicates a strong market presence. Its performance peers include Dean's Italian Steakhouse, Annampuram Authentic South Indian Restaurant, Jeff's Bagel Run, El Tiempo Cantina, Bellacino's Pizza & Grinders, and The Smith, all within similar high percentiles.
Customer satisfaction reflects the happiness and loyalty of customers, directly impacting brand reputation and repeat business.
Louisiana's overall customer satisfaction is 71%, up by 4.2 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT in Texas is high at 77% with significant growth (17.4pp), while California shows a lower CSAT of 63% with a decrease (-12.2pp). The CSAT has fluctuated between 64.63 and 74.82 in recent months.
Average check is a key indicator of how much customers spend per visit, influencing revenue and profitability analysis.
The overall average check for Louisiana is $20.3, a 0.6% increase year-over-year. California has a higher average check of $21.6 USD, while Texas has a lower average check of $18.9 USD. The average check has varied between $18.90 and $22.83 in recent months.
Tracking the number of outlets indicates the brand's expansion and market reach within different geographic areas.
Louisiana has 49 outlets in California and 26 in Texas. There are also 3 outlets in Louisiana, 2 in North Carolina, and 1 each in Illinois and Arkansas. Outlet distribution is concentrated in California and Texas.
Competitor analysis helps understand the competitive landscape and identify key players attracting the same customer base.
Louisiana's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (25%), Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (12%), Taco Bell (9.67%), Starbucks (9.67%), and Burger King (9.67%). These brands attract a significant portion of Louisiana's customer base.
Understanding traffic workload by hour helps optimize staffing and resources to meet customer demand efficiently.
Louisiana experiences peak traffic workload between 10 AM and 7 PM, with the highest workload occurring from 2 PM to 5 PM (63-64). Traffic is significantly lower during the early morning hours, indicating a need for resource allocation aligning with peak hours.
Analyzing consumer segments enables targeted marketing strategies based on demographic characteristics like gender and generation.
Louisiana's customer base is predominantly women (90% affinity index, decreased by 9.70), men are overrepresented (108% affinity index, increased by 8.25). Gen X is significantly overrepresented (110% affinity index, increased by 10.25), Gen Y is average (100% affinity index, increased by 0.42) while Gen Z are underrepresented (34% affinity index, decreased by 66.13).