Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Leo's Coney Island is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Leo's Coney Island performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Leo's Coney Island performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Leo's Coney Island' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Leo's Coney Island' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows a brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Leo's Coney Island's market performance is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position in the market. This high percentile signifies that the brand captures a significant share of customer foot traffic. Performance peers in a similar range include LOS TACOS No.1, Tatte Bakery & Cafe, Gen Korean BBQ House, Fuddruckers, Típico Rinconcito Colombiano, and Sangam Chettinad Indian Cuisine.
Customer satisfaction reflects loyalty and the likelihood of repeat business, critical for sustainable growth and positive brand perception.
Leo's Coney Island demonstrates a 70% customer satisfaction rate, which increased by 8.2 percentage points year-over-year. In Michigan, the CSAT also stands at 70% with the same growth. The CSAT dynamic data shows fluctuations between 68.86 and 71.37 over the reported months, indicating generally positive customer sentiment with room for slight improvement.
Average check indicates how much customers spend per visit, influencing revenue and profitability strategies for the brand.
Leo's Coney Island's average check is $17 USD, a 0.8% increase year-over-year. Michigan's average check mirrors the overall value. The average check dynamic fluctuates between $16.64 and $17.27 during the reporting period, showing stable customer spending habits.
Number of outlets reflects brand reach and market penetration, influencing accessibility and overall revenue potential.
Leo's Coney Island has 73 outlets in Michigan, showing its current market coverage. The number of locations provides insight into the brand's physical presence and operational scale within the region.
Competitor analysis helps identify market threats and opportunities, informing strategies to gain a competitive edge and attract customers.
The top competitors for Leo's Coney Island, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (19.74%), Taco Bell (7.93%), Culver's (7.65%), Burger King (6.70%), and Wendy's (6.61%). This data indicates the other popular choices among Leo's Coney Island customers.
Analyzing traffic workload helps optimize staffing and resource allocation, ensuring efficient service during peak hours and managing operational costs.
Leo's Coney Island experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 1 PM, with the highest workload at 12 PM (69.33%). Traffic starts picking up around 7 AM, peaks midday, and gradually decreases into the night. Understanding these trends helps manage staffing and resources.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, optimizing product offerings and communication strategies for different demographic groups.
Leo's Coney Island's customer base shows an overrepresentation of women (93 affinity index) and men (106 affinity index). Generational affinity indicates Gen X is highly overrepresented (125 affinity index). Gen Y (76 affinity index) and Gen Z (74 affinity index) are underrepresented.